Defensive Coordinators
In order to understand if calls to fire Defensive Coordinator Pat Narduzzi are warranted, we must first discuss the role of the Defensive Coordinator and clearly define the job.
So, let's start with a joke. An engineer works at a company for over 30 years and finally retires. After he retires a machine that he had worked on during his career breaks down. The company tries to fix the machine, but has no luck. So they call the engineer and request that he come back in and fix the machine. He comes in one day, looks at the machine for about an hour, then pulls out a piece of chalk and puts an X onto one of the components of the machine. He tells the company to replace that part. The company agrees, replaces the part and the machine is working again. The company asks the engineer to send in a bill for his work. The engineer sends in a bill for $50,000. The company sees the bill and is surprised at how much it is so they ask the engineer to create an itemized invoice. The engineer agrees and sends in the invoice. The invoice reads
Chalk $1
Knowing where to use the chalk $49,999
A DC is paid to teach the defense to act like a unit. How to read and react to a play. To review game film of his team and his opponents. To create a game plan. To identify a scheme to use. To put his players in positions to make plays. The most important thing a DC is paid for though is for half time adjustments. That is where a DC proves his worth.
Ray Rhodes is a former NFL player and head coach. He has been a DC for many teams. The reasons for this is half time adjustments. Rhodes does not make them. The Washington Redskins and Denver Broncos fired him because he would not make half time adjustments. He then became the DC of the Seattle Seahawks and was eventually demoted to Defensive Assistant. You do not get demoted for doing a good job.
The proof for the value of a DC's half time adjustment is available, and unfortunately for the Spartans, it comes from Michigan. Michigan's new DC is Greg Robinson. He won two Superbowls as a DC with the Denver Broncos and was the DC when the KC Chiefs were coached by Dick Vermeil and went to the playoffs. He is a bad head coach, but a quality DC. The last three Michigan games show why.
| Opponent | 1st Half | 2nd Half |
|---|---|---|
| ND | 297 | 173 |
| EMU | 186 | 100 |
| Indiana | 265 | 202 |
ND put up over 450 yards against Michigan. Almost two thirds of that offense was in the first half. So, Michigan did something in the second half that drastically reduced ND's ability to move the ball. The same held true for EMU and Indiana. That is three consecutive games where the Michigan defense performed significantly better in the second half compared to the first half. And with giving up less yards, their defense also gives up less scoring opportunities.
MSU DC and Half Time Adjustments, the stats speak for themselves.
| Opponent | 1st Half | 2nd Half |
|---|---|---|
| CMU | 202 | 237 |
| ND | 208 | 203 |
| Wisconsin | 210 | 212 |
The only game that sticks out to me is Wisconsin, and that is because they were trying to kill the clock for most of the 4th quarter thereby slowing their second half production. After doing the MSUFR on the defense for CMU, ND and Wisconsin, I did not notice any change to the scheme between the first and second half. Either MSU is not making any, or they are exceptionally ineffective.
As of right now, it does not look like Narduzzi is a very good DC. However, the MSU defense did add new wrinkles for the game with the Badgers. The team could be having problems picking up the scheme and the DC is keeping it simple and slowly adding new formations, blitzes, etc. We honestly do not know enough about the defense until probably 8 games into the season. Then I think the calls for a change at DC would be legitimate.
This is a FanPost, written by a member of the TOC community. It does not represent the official positions of The Only Colors, Inc.--largely because we have no official positions.
6 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
FWIW, Narduzzi's sticking to his guns
“I’ll get an e-mail and I’ll look and I’ll read the first line and it says, ‘Dear coach,’ and I’ll be like — delete. Nobody has an idea what goes on in a football program. Everybody has their ideas of what you should do. And you’ve got to play fundamentals, you’ve got to play your base defense. You don’t change your defense in the middle of the year, you play your defense and you do it the right way.
“And that’s always been our philosophy. I’ve run the same defense for 20 years, and if it’s played properly, it’s effective. And if you have one guy — it only takes one guy — and what you guys sometimes don’t look at when you’re watching the film, sometimes it’s one guy but that’s all it takes. Defense is reaction football and if you have one guy out of place, you’re gonna have a problem. And it seems like there’s one guy here and then the next play he does a great job and another guy messes up. And that’s gonna cause you problems.”
Cheer for The Only Colors: Green and White!
by KJ@theonlycolors on Oct 2, 2009 11:02 AM CDT reply actions
"I’ll get an e-mail and I’ll look and I’ll read the first line and it says, ‘Dear coach,’ and I’ll be like — delete. Nobody has an idea what goes on in a football program.
Even if true, what an utterly obnoxious thing to say.
"Do not cheat your team or your teammates. Know your plays. Block. Protect. Add to what we are trying to do."
The Only Colors
by LVS on Oct 2, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions
More evidence that Narduzzi needs to go.
Narduzzi confirms almost everything I speculated here.
Run the same defense for 20 years and it’s been effective? Offenses haven’t been the same for 20 years. They are adapting, changing, becoming more lethal against a 20-year old base defense.
“Only takes one guy”? Basically you are saying that your scheme is man-for-man on the offense. A fair fight, which is NOT the object — you want it as unfair as possible in your favor. Adjust the scheme so it isn’t reliant on any one guy not making a mistake.
Paper, paper, paper. Paper’s been good against rock for 20 years so I’ll just keep throwing paper. Hey, what’s the big idea, you throwing candle?
More grist for the mill.
Narduzzi, above:
…you’ve got to play your base defense. You don’t change your defense in the middle of the year, you play your defense and you do it the right way….And that’s always been our philosophy. I’ve run the same defense for 20 years, and if it’s played properly, it’s effective.
Greg Robinson, Narduzzi’s opposite number at Michigan (per mgoblog; h/t LVS’s preview:)
Greg Robinson is busy installing all sorts of different stuff and slants and various games to cover up for the fact that he’s got no depth, two seniors, and three walk-ons contributing.
So either stick with what you’re doing, even though it isn’t working, or make scheme adjustments to emphasize your strengths while covering for your weaknesses.
Hmm.
Position to Succeed
DCs need to put their players in positions to succeed.
Right now I think that Pat is putting the players in a position to fail.





















