The Only Colors: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: SB Nation MMA Rankings for August 2010

Math isn't all that impressed with us

OR "We really need some actual college basketball competition to talk about."

As part of its voluminous (1,232 pages!) College Basketball Encyclopedia, the good folks at ESPN got Jeff Sagarin to go back and compute his mathematical ratings for every college basketball season going back to 1938.  Somewhat oddly, Michigan State is ranked just 15th in the all-time rating compilation--and, even more strangely--just 8th among the current 11 Big Ten teams.

After all, MSU ranks 9th in the number of all-time Final Four appearances, and only 6 other schools have won more NCAA championships.

But here's the thing: It's a formula.  Formulas are based on certain assumptions.  In this case, Mr. Sagarin's formula is based on the assumption that every game a team plays has equal importance.  Nonconference games count the same as NCAA Tournnament games.  The final game in an 8-20 season counts the same as the final game in a 30-2 season.  Above all else, the Sagarin ratings value consistency (consistency being of predictive utility).

For all our recent success, the MSU basketball program has not been all that consistent through the decades, as conceded by our current head coach:

"We've had a strange career here," MSU coach Tom Izzo said. "Good in the '50s, down in the '60s and '70s [save a title in 1979 and a regional final appearance in '78], average half of the '80s, good the rest of, started better in the '90s and in the last 12 years we've been damn good.

"We're not as consistent as some programs, but I'm surprised so many Big Ten programs are in there."

Decade-by-decade Sagarin rankings for all the Big Ten schools after the jump.

Star-divide

ILL IND IOWA MICH MSU MINN NW OSU PSU PUR WIS
1940s 3 5 16 10 14 23 8 37 7 13
1950s 2 5 8 21 11 25 30
1960s 12 27 20 37 34 4 28
1970s 5 39 11 32 17 10
1980s 4 3 8 13 39 22 10
1990s 29 7 22 12 13 21 11
2000s 6 31 5 22 40 11
All-Time 6 5 10 13 15 14 77 9 82 8 28

(Notes: A blank entry indicates the program did not appear in the top 40 for that particular decade.
The 1940s include the 1937-38 and 1938-39 seasons.)

Given those decade-by-decade numbers, it's fairly remarkable MSU even got to #15 in the all-time rankings.  Minnesota, which finished one spot ahead of MSU on the all-time list, appeared in the top 40 in all 6 of the decades prior to the 2000s.  Meanwhile, MSU appeared in the top 40 in just 4 decades and didn't make the top 20 until the last two decades.

So, understood for what it represents, I don't think the #15 ranking is anything to take umbrage over.  (And it's actually right in line with the #15 spot Beyond the Arc slotted MSU in at last year; that exercise also valued consistency, although it gave some weighting to championships and NCAA Tournament performance.)  At the end of the day, college basketball is about the NCAA Tournament.  And our tournament-related rankings are just fine.

Further, to quote one of this country's great sports philosophers, "I ain't really concerned with what was happening in the dinosaur ages.  Leon lives in the right now."  And, in the right now, MSU's ranking looks A-OK.

P.S. I'm not quite sure why the Big Ten--with 8 of the top 15 teams--comes out so well in the all-time rankings.  It may just be a function of having more well-established programs going back 7 decades.  Every current Big Ten team but MSU (which, along with Penn State, was not a member of the conference at the time) appeared in the top 40 for the 1940s.

0 recs  |  Comment 7 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Its just such a dumb way to rank teams.

"There are no next times when you're competing for big things." - Tom Izzo
Go Spartans

by msufan23 on Oct 5, 2009 10:21 PM CDT reply actions  

It would be interesting to see how a more “modern” metric like strength of schedule would factor in to something like that. If what you are saying is true, beating Hillsdale College and beating Duke (or losing to either) would count exactly the same amount, which is really quite amazing.

It would be really interesting to see a strength of schedule comparison going back through the decades, including how MSU would fare in such a comparison.

One interesting thing about this is the heavy reward this would give a team for doing something like winning the NIT, where you will probably end up with more wins than most tourney teams.

"It's a trap!"

by AdmiralAkbar on Oct 5, 2009 10:28 PM CDT reply actions  

To clarify

Strength of schedule is considered in the ratings. Every game is weighted equally; every opponent is not.

Cheer for The Only Colors: Green and White!

by KJ@theonlycolors on Oct 6, 2009 7:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Key Words - back to 1938

Michigan State didn’t enter the Big Ten until 1952-53ish, so that’s about 14-15 years of sub-par competition. I bet that lowered the score.

by Pete Rossman on Oct 5, 2009 10:32 PM CDT reply actions  

Makes Izzo's accomplishments...

… even more impressive. He took an uneven, middle of the road program and turned it into a perennial powerhouse. Don’t forget that the man had a dream, and the dream was to turn MSU into an elite program, not just to be hired to coach an elite program. Gigantice difference.

by DP99 on Oct 6, 2009 12:56 AM CDT reply actions  

As it turns out,

the methodology was to double weight NCAA Tournament games.

SO NOW I AM OUTRAGED ABOUT OUR RANKING!

Cheer for The Only Colors: Green and White!

by KJ@theonlycolors on Oct 6, 2009 9:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Michigan State basketball and football blog community
Start posting about the Spartans »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Recruiting data
Adorno5_small
Mike Shaw and 2011 Basketball Recruiting Loose Ends
State_small
Recruiting Tidbits
Small
Donavon Clark!
Small
Personal expectations when an MSU football schedule is announced.
Delvonduck_small
UM's NCAA Allegations, As Told Through "The Office"
Small
Big Ten Divisions
Small
Recruit #14 Jack Allen
Small
South Carolina-MSU is part of ESPN's 24 hour hoops marathon
State_small
Positional Revisionism and MSU Basketball

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Florida State's Christian Ponder, left, runs as Miami's Marcus Robinson gives chase during the first quarter of an NCAA college football game Monday, Sept. 7, 2009, in Tallahassee, Fla. (AP Photo/Phil Coale)

2010 ACC College Football Preview: Deep Conference Should Make For Highly Competitive Season

Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany speaks in Lincoln, Neb., Friday, June 11, 2010, in front of a Big Ten and a Nebraska backdrop. Nebraska made it official Friday and applied for membership in the Big Ten Conference, a potentially crippling blow to the Big 12 and the biggest move yet in an off season overhaul that will leave college sports looking much different by this time next year.(AP Photo/Nati Harnik) +5 updates

Big Ten Announces Conference Divisions For 2011

FILE - In this Sept. 24, 2009 photo, South Carolina's head coach Steve Spurrier stands with his quarterback Stephen Garcia (5) before the start of their NCAA college football game against Mississippi at Williams Brice Stadium in Columbia, S.C.    A year ago, first-time postseason starter Stephen Garcia got chewed out by South Carolina coach Steve Spurrier for playing video games the night before the Outback Bowl game. These days, Garcia putting all his focus where it counts most _ on the Gamecocks.  (AP Photo/Mary Ann Chastain, File)

College Football Kickoff: 2010 Season Gets Underway With Southern Mississippi At South Carolina

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Onlycolors-md_small KJ@theonlycolors

Sbnation2_small Pete Rossman

Woodward_small LVS

Contributors

Square_sun_small Steve Hendershot

Adorno5_small intrpdtrvlr

Oldspartan_small Rob Visconti