The Road Ahead
While the world sure seems like a better place for MSU football fans than it did last week at this time, our record is still on the wrong side of .500. At 2-3, the team needs to go 4-3 down the stretch to be technically eligible for a bowl game. That becomes 5-2 if the goal is to ensure the team goes bowling, regardless of the number of other bowl-eligible teams in the conference.
Projecting points spreads for the remaining 7 games using the current Sagarin ratings yields this table of plausible-looking numbers (and, yes, it's officially Jeff Sagarin Week here at TOC):
|
The first column of numbers uses the standard Sagarin ratings--which are melded from the ELO-CHESS ratings (looks only at wins/losses, adjusted for SOS; ignores margin of victory/loss) and the PREDICTOR ratings (looks at only at margin of victory/loss, adjusted for strength of schedule; ignores binary win/loss result). MSU comes out a little better in the PREDICTOR-only-based point spreads in the second column of numbers, due to the close losses to CMU and Notre Dame.
From a binary standpoint, the projections show a 4-3 or 5-2 record down the stretch. But, outside of the home games against Northwestern and Western Michigan, the spreads are all basically within a touchdown either way. That's a function of (1) playing 2 of the 3 Big Ten teams on our schedule who have clearly performed worse than us to date on the road and (2) playing the two Big Ten teams on our schedule that have clearly outperformed us at home.
One can easily come up with two pretty divergent-put-conceivable extremes in terms of MSU's final regular season record:
- Beat Northwestern and Western at home, get upset by Illinois and Purdue on the road, and lose the three games we're underdogs in: 4-8.
- Win all the games we're favored in, win the coin-flip game with Minnesota, and upset either Iowa or Penn State at home: 8-4.
I'd say getting to 7-5 and going to a winnable, non-Pizza!Pizza! bowl game should be the goal. But, if I had to put money on the regular-season-wins roulette wheel, I'd have to go with Black 6.
0 recs |
6 comments
|
Comments
If Dantonio has done one thing for the Spartans
It’s typically winning the games we should win.
That CMU game was such an anomaly, that onside kick such a freak show, that I feel comfortable with this being a solid indicator of success against less talented squads.
With that said, 7-5 is the realistic goal, with a win potentially flipping to either side.
by cwel87 on Oct 8, 2009 2:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If I can...
…make up a B.S. stat, how about this? Dantonio is 3-0 with his team’s back to the wall. (Acronym pending)
In 2007, after the U of M loss, we needed to win at Purdue and beat Penn State in East Lansing to go to a bowl and they did it. This year, the team held on and beat Michigan when we absolutely needed it.
If you put it as go 2-1 and then 3-1, it seems more doable. At it really is. Even Iowa and PSU look good, but not dominating and we get them in East Lansing.
by witless chum on Oct 8, 2009 6:05 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
For 7-5 ...
… I feel we need to get a win against either Iowa or PSU. Even though all the road games are winnable, I think it’s realistic to expect to lose one.
luttez pour les seuls couleurs, vert et blanc
by vert_et_blanc on Oct 8, 2009 11:49 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
When you compared the Predictor...
…did you add the 2.91 points (or whatever it is) for home advantage?
If MSU was to win one of the home-dog games, which is more likely, Iowa or PSU?
by CPT Hoolie on Oct 8, 2009 11:57 AM CDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
The 2.91 is built into both columns of numbers
Cheer for The Only Colors: Green and White!
by KJ@theonlycolors on Oct 8, 2009 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 













