Big Ten Officiating
What better way to celebrate a big win over Western than to go back and look at the Minnesota game.
Since last year during the Michigan game when Michigan was awarded a TD, the Big Ten officiating for football has been on my radar for being bad. I am sure everyone remembers the play, the receiver was in the air, hit the pylon with his foot and the play was called no catch on the field. The play was reviewed by the replay official and he awarded Michigan a TD. The pylon is out of bounds in the endzone, so when the player touched the pylon, he established himself as being out of bounds. How they screwed that one up is beyond me, but they did.
After that I have seen a few plays this year that were not exactly stellar calls, or really bad non calls. So, back to the Minnesota game.
This is the play where Michigan State gets flagged for delay of game. The first three images show that ball being hiked with the play clock still showing 1 second. The last image is after the play clock has gone to zero. You can clearly see that the ball has already been hiked. The officials got this call wrong. (The images cover a little over 0.1 seconds, so uh, yeah there is some sour grapes to this call, but seeing as I screamed at the TV when I was watching it live I think it is one that should not have been made.)
This isn't a sour grapes post about officiating screwing MSU. This is about the bad officiating in the Big Ten. It has been bad all year. It is not going to get any better. The Big Ten must address this issue and improve the officiating. If we are going to have quality football games being played the officials can not get calls wrong like the one above.
I am also iffy on the overturned fumble play against Minnesota. It is questionable if the Gopher caught the ball. He caught the ball, had two feet down and started to turn upfield when Brandon Denson punched the ball out of his hands. The receiver is in control of the ball until Denson knocks it out of his hands. I think this should be a fumble. On the field, this was ruled as a fumble. Replay over turned the call. Technically this is an iffy call. For it to be a catch, the reciever must maintain possession of the ball, have one foot down, and then make a football like move. In this case, the ball comes out when the receiver is making his football like move. The problem I have is that it is a judgement call. Replay overturns plays when they have indisputable evidence. The replay official overturned a judgement call with his own judgement call. That isn't exactly indisputable evidence. Big Brother Brian at MGoBlog discusses bad replay calls as well in a recent UV post.
Hopefully the Big Ten will go through and address this issue by hiring some full time officials and have better accountability for their work. For now this issue is on the President's of each University. They have to lean on the Big Ten commisioner to get him to make a change.
This is a FanPost, written by a member of the TOC community. It does not represent the official positions of The Only Colors, Inc.--largely because we have no official positions.
0 recs |
8 comments
Comments
Re: The Nonfumble
Dantonio said Sunday night that the league has responded to his query on the fumble-turned-incompletion-by-half-asleep-replay-official (that’s my term, by the way) last week at Minnesota. But he wouldn’t say what the league said.
“I think you need to take it up with the people there,” he said. “I don’t want to get involved with that. It’s past.”
My interpretation: League officials agreed that the call was bad this time (how could they not?) but he doesn’t want to talk about it. Because he could be reprimanded. The Big Ten certainly won’t admit when it’s wrong.
At this point, I’m pretty sure the Big Ten just gives a guy a magic eight ball and puts him in the replay booth.
Fight for The Only Colors: Green and White!
by KJ@theonlycolors on Nov 9, 2009 7:32 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I watched the Indiana-Iowa touchdown for the first time today. That’s HORRIBLE! You can see where the turf is effected by the player’s foot dragging. Unless you choose to believe that’s some kind of a visual anomaly (clearly present in two different angles), then that is clearly a touchdown. Gross. Sucks to be Indiana. Again.
by intrpdtrvlr on Nov 9, 2009 8:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
There was one angle where it appeared that the Indiana player briefly lost control of the ball as he fell to the ground, which would make it incomplete. The problem is, I don’t think it was anywhere near clear enough to overturn. (I wish the ref would have explained why the ruling was overturned; they’re supposed to do so but some refs are much better about that than others.)
Same is true of the Minnesota fumble-turned-incomplete: you can see the ball moving around before he gets hit, which suggests that he doesn’t have full control of it yet. Again, not enough to overturn IMO, but enough that I’m inclined to think that, had the replay rule been “forget what the call on the field was, replay official’s judgment overrules that”, it would have been correct to call it incomplete.
Both were arguable calls when made; neither should have been overturned according to the standards required to overturn a call on replay.
by SpartanDan on Nov 10, 2009 12:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Brian's right
about the replay people being bad refs. Apparently some think it’s a good idea to do this since with multiple angles/opportunities to see the play, how could they mess the call up?
We have experience that a bad ref is even worse in the booth than on the field, since the booth essentially gets final say.
Light a man a fire, he'll stay warm for a day.
Light a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
by Seer on Nov 9, 2009 11:59 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Replay Reversal
I’m just surprised at the number of calls that have been overturned this year. I agree with what was posted…..I think the word “indisputable” is slowly losing its meaning.
by RickTheBloggerMartel on Nov 9, 2009 6:28 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
As to the clock...
…issue, isn’t it possible BTN’s clock isn’t perfectly synchronized? I admit I don’t really know the technology involved, but I wouldn’t be shocked to hear that BTN is bad at it.
Overall, I’m not so sure that refs are really worse. I think that with replay we expect them to be able to do better, but it’s still led to some groaners, so we notice it more. If they can’t do better than this, nuke the replay rule and let them just call it on the field.
by witless chum on Nov 10, 2009 2:59 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The great thing about the Big Ten is that bad officiating never seems to end
It’s basketball season. Can’t wait for Mr. Hightower.
DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?
by ReadingRambler on Nov 15, 2009 11:28 AM CST reply actions 0 recs





















