Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

The Season in Review: Chris Allen Edition

This is the third in a series of posts looking at the performance of individual MSU basketball players this past season.  Because the end goal is to discuss improvements and/or adjustments that appear to be in order for next season, the series is limited to returning players.  Today: Chris Allen.

When this past season began, Chris Allen was my candidate to be MSU's breakout player.  He seemed poised to step into Drew Neitzel's role as the team's designated 3-point specialist and, as a freshman, he had shown the ability to score in a variety ways beyond just shooting open jumpshots.

Star-divide

The early returns were promising, as Allen scored 15 or more points in 4 of MSU's first 9 games--including 16 points against North Carolina.  From there, though, things went downhill; Allen hit the 15-point mark in only 3 of the team's final 28 games.

More numbers:


2PM/G 2PA/G 2PT% 3PM/G 3PA/G 3PT% FTM/G FTA/G FT% PTS/G
Nonconference 1.7 4.1 42.2 1.8 4.8 37.7 1.3 1.6 77.8 10.2
Conf Reg Season 1.3 2.6 48.0 1.3 4.2 31.6 1.6 2.0 78.9 8.1
Posteason 1.1 3.3 34.6 0.9 4.4 20.0 1.9 2.4 78.9 6.8
Full Season 1.4 3.2 43.0 1.4 4.4 31.1 1.6 2.0 78.7 8.4

MIN/G OREB/G DREB/G AST/G TO/G STL/G BLK/G PF/G
Nonconference 19.5 0.5 2.2 1.4 1.4 0.7 0.0 1.5
Conf Reg Season 18.6 0.7 1.3 1.2 1.6 0.3 0.0 1.8
Posteason 19.5 1.1 1.0 1.4 0.5 0.1 0.0 1.5
Full Season 19.0 0.7 1.5 1.3 1.3 0.4 0.0 1.7

(Notes: "Conference Regular Season" includes the Kansas game.  2PM/G = 2-pointers made per game, etc.)

There's a pretty simple story here: Allen's jumpshot went missing.  His 3-point shooting percentage plummeted from 37.7% in nonconference play to 20.0% in MSU's 8 postseason games.  He managed to continue scoring at an efficient rate on 2-point attempts in conference regular season play, but that shooting percentage dropped in postseason play, as well.

My intuitive evaluation of Allen's shooting woes: His jumpshot is perhaps too perfectly refined.  When he's on, he's nearly unstoppable.  He has a high release, gets his shot off quickly, and puts great rotation on the ball.  But as soon as he misses a couple shots, his mechanics fall apart and he can't put everything back together again .  Allen had three games this season in which he took 6 or more 3-point shots and didn't make a single shot (including the rematch with UNC).

So that's the bad news.

Here's the good news: Allen improved enough in other areas of the game that he wasn't a complete liability when his shot wasn't falling.  All of his major non-field goal shooting stats held up during conference and postseason play: free throw attempts and percentage, rebounding, and assists.  And he actually reduced his turnover numbers substantially in postseason play.

You'll note his minutes per game didn't drop as his shooting numbers fell.  Tom Izzo's confidence in Allen actually seemed to grow as Allen's shooting problems increased.  Defensively, his progress was particularly encouraging, as he became much less prone to mental errors.  His progression was one of the keys in MSU's dramatic improvement in 3-point defense in conference play.

Going into next season, Allen's in a similar position to the one he was in last year: If he can become the consistent 3-point shooter he was billed to be entering college, he has the potential to be a 15-point-per-game scorer.  The problem is that his college career is now half over and his career 3-point shooting percentage is just 33.3%.  If he can move that number up near 40.0%, the potential remains for Allen to become an all-conference-level player, given the way he has progressed in other facets of the game.

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Hi postseason stats might look a little better

If you throw out the UNC game in which he apparently broke his foot. We don’t know when the injury happened but he pretty much played the whole game so there’s a possibility he injured it early and just gutted out the game anyway. Needless to say, playing with a broken foot can affect your shot.

Still, his shooting was not on during the tournament and for much of the Big Ten season, but he found other ways to contribute. Cudos to him for that – if nothing else he could develop into a defensive stopper (a glue guy type of player) if he really focuses on improving his D. I think his shooting mechanics are so good that he should be able to bounce back and become a very good outside shooter though – we’ve had other players go into slumps and break out of them, so hopefully he can do it too.

by TheCrestedHelm on May 21, 2009 8:21 AM CDT reply actions  

Postseason Stats

He was 7-28 (25.0%) in the other 7 postseason games.

But you’re right that I probably should have cut him a little bit of a break on his performance in the title game.

Hopefully, he’s having Chris Hill’s career in reverse (in terms of shooting the ball).

Cheer for The Only Colors: Green and White!

by KJ@theonlycolors on May 21, 2009 9:19 AM CDT reply actions  

Gets his shot of quickly?

Doug Gottleib mentioned this in a scouting report of State during the tourney. I just don’t see it. It seemed like it took him forever to set up his shot and many attempts were blocked. All we heard coming in was his shooting stroke was like Respert and Steve Smith. Did the new three point line mess with him? We really need Chris’ shot to come through next year. Lucious shot looked nice but he was getting killed on defense and turning the ball over constantly. With the opposing team focusing on Kalin, there should be plenty of good looks for Chris. Let’s hope he can knock them down consistently.

by Chris in Kzoo on May 21, 2009 9:48 AM CDT reply actions  

When he’s in rhythm, he has a very quick release. When he’s not, then he starts hesitating and it all falls apart.

Youtube evidence of what his shot looks like when he’s on (2008 highlights; couldn’t find anything from this season):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MX9VILhObis

Cheer for The Only Colors: Green and White!

by KJ@theonlycolors on May 21, 2009 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Type of shooter?

I’m not an b-ball expert, but did read on a different board – much earlier this year, that Allen is not really a catch and shoot guy ala Drew Neitzel. He needs a dribble or two to get his rhythm going. Also I vaguely recall some commentator said during one game that he seems to shoot better when he is not really squared up which seems counter intuitive. I think he is a hard worker (improved ball handling), can make things happen when his shot is not falling and will be just fine, maybe a little less wing and more point with KLIF1 and KLIF2.

by spartanbballfan on May 21, 2009 3:42 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Michigan State basketball and football blog community

Managers

Petenewpic_small Pete Rossman

Spiritofd_small LVS

Contributors

Square_sun_small Steve Hendershot

Marvin_small SpartanDan

State_small Con-T

Adorno5_small intrpdtrvlr

Patrickhayes_small patrick_hayes

Keep-calm-carry-on_small HeckDorland