Dancing with the Devil(s) in the Pale Moonlight: MSU-Duke Preview
Your MICHIGAN STATE SPARTANS vs. the DUKE BLUE DEVILS
CAMERON INDOOR STADIUM, DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
WEDNESDAY, 9:30 PM (ET)
TV: ESPN (Shulman/Vitale/Burke)
ONLINE RADIO FEED: Spartan Sports Network
The numbers above give you a sense just how good Duke has been on offense so far this season. KenPom has them at #2 in projected adjusted offensive efficiency, reflecting a combination of how good they were last season and how good they've been so far this season. The Blue Devils have made a whopping 44.4% of their 3-point attempts this season and a just-slightly-less-impressive 53.7% of their 2-point attempts. They can shoot the rock.
On the other end of the court, well, Duke is also at #2 in KenPom's projected defensive efficiency numbers. The team's defensive profile is more balanced, ranking in the top-100 nationally in all four factors. They've been particularly adept at forcing tough 3-point looks; opponents are shooting just 26.2% from beyond the arc.
For us Spartan types, the most frightening part of the Duke statistical profile is, of course, the team's propensity to force turnovers. This season, opponents have turned it over on 24.2% of possessions. That figure was lower last season at 21.3%, but historically the Blue Devils have posted defensive turnover percentages closer to 25% than to 20%. Coach K and Tom Izzo are both man-to-man disciples, but Krzyzewski's version is much more aggressive--looking to cut off passing lanes and force the action, as contrasted with Izzo's more passive, collapsing scheme. To put in succinctly: Duke plays the kind of defense that drives MSU crazy.
Another upshot of Duke's aggressive defensive style is that opponents don't have the luxury of setting up for a lot of 3-point looks; Duke foes consistently take less than 30% of their field goal attempts from beyond the arc. That takes away, to some extent, what's been one of MSU's few distinct strengths so far this season, as the Spartans have knocked down 39.4% of their 3-point attempts.
If there is a chink in Duke's armor, it's on the boards. The Devils rank just 118th nationally in offensive rebounding percentage and 86th in defensive rebounding percentage. Zorbek's graduation has left a void here, particularly on the offensive end where he was a force of nature last season (21.4% individual OffReb%). Unfortunately, MSU's rebounding ranks aren't any more impressive (#109 on offense; #165 on defense). The defensive number is, we hope, at least partially a function of having played some very good offensive rebounding teams in South Carolina, UConn, and Washington. Still, something is clearly amiss relative to the historically standard Spartan rebounding dominance.
Overall, Duke is clearly operating at a much more efficient level than the team that started the season ranked just below them in the polls. To pull out a win in what will be, as always, a very hostile setting, things will really need to fall into place for MSU. The most plausible path to a Spartan upset looks something like this:
1. MSU keeps its turnover percentage below 25%. Anything above that and Duke will run them off the court very early. Given the nature of the match-up, MSU isn't going to be able to eliminate turnovers, but the team does need to limit them to the purposeful variety; simple giveaways at midcourt will merely tack on points to what's already a double-digit expected point differential for Duke. Chances are it's going to take the younger MSU players (plus Korie Lucious) some time to adjust to the intensity of the environment, both off the court and on it. That means MSU's two proven playmakers, Kalin Lucas and Draymond Green, may need to take things into their own hands early and create some offense going toward the rim.
Yesterday, I claimed to be agnostic on the question of whether Draymond should start or come off the bench. Today, I have a firm opinion: He should start tomorrow night to help avoid an early turnover bonanza for the Blue Devils. (One other lineup opinion: I love the guy, but I really don't see Austin Thornton doing well in this match-up. Play Mike Kebler a little if you need a body, but otherwise it's on the Lucas/Summers/Lucious/Appling group to play nearly all the minutes on the perimeter.)
2. MSU wins the rebounding battle convincingly. Given that MSU is almost certain to give up multiple possessions in the turnover battle, earning some second-chance points, and preventing Duke from doing the same, will be imperative to keeping the scoring opportunities roughly equal. Green is even more likely to be used in a playmaking capacity in this game, so it's up to Delvon Roe and Garrick Sherman to hold their own inside against the Plumlee boys--and then some. (10 minutes of Derrick Nix banging around in the paint should help, too.) Durrell Summers may have a tough time finding clean looks against the Duke defense; putting some energy into crashing the offensive glass against the (generally) smaller Blue Devil guards would be a worthwhile alternative investment.
3. Duke goes cold (at least relatively speaking) from 3-point range. This is, of course, the great hope of all underdogs going into a match-up with Duke. Given the nature of the MSU defense, Duke is very likely to take 20-25 three-point shots tomorrow night. If they make 40% of those attempts, I have a hard time seeing MSU playing with a high enough level of efficiency to keep up on the other end of the court. Take that percentage down to 35% or below, and maybe it's a ballgame.
On a final tactical note, Rexrode has this cryptic note in a blog post that went up tonight:
Speaking of MSU-Duke, Kyrie Irving has the attention of the Spartans. Korie Lucious is excited about getting to check Irving. Lucious and Kalin Lucas looked good in practice Monday, no hobbling and full participation. And Delvon Roe -- who will see a lot of Kyle Singler on Wednesday (more on that Wednesday) -- checked Durrell Summers for a while and actually did a pretty good job.
Based on the minutes-played numbers, it looks like Duke goes small (three guards, Singler, and a big guy) and big (Singler at the 3 with two bigs) in fairly equal chunks of time. I assume the idea is that MSU would rather have a guard (Summers?) chasing Singler around the perimeter, which would mean moving a big man onto a Duke guard when the Blue Devils go small. I'm more than a little skeptical, though, that Roe can keep up with an athletic guard who appears to shoot the ball quite proficiently. My inclination would be to put a big on Singler and force him to drive; he wasn't all that efficient inside the arc last season (.424) and doesn't pass the ball with great frequency (1.0 assist/game this season; 2.4 last season). I suppose I'll defer to Tom Izzo's judgment, though.
KenPom predicts an 80-67 win for Duke in 72 possessions, giving MSU just a 13% chance of winning. In my 3+ seasons of basketball blogging, I don't think I've ever made a statement like this going into a game: I will consider it a moral victory if MSU keeps the game within a single-digit deficit for 40 minutes. On paper, the Spartans have the personnel to match up with Duke, but so far that personnel just hasn't gelled for any considerable length of time. MSU's one quality win (vs. Washington) was earned on the backs of two players.
Things will, we assume, start coming together at some point for this MSU team. Durham would be an ideal, but somewhat unlikely, place for that to happen.
57 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"I always ask that of all my prey. I just like the sound of it."
All right, let’s attack these guys. For all the doom and gloom, some of which is justified, keep in mind that MSU has a number of guys who are planning on playing professional basketball at some level. Their eyes will light up for this one and the fact that everyone will be watching. No one’s going to have an intensity problem tomorrow. In fact, it might be too high.
I get the nervousness over the turnovers, but Izzo knows this, and he knows Duke overplays every pass. Teams have traditionally been able to back-door Duke on screens and cuts. I’d be surprised if Izzo doesn’t try to hit Duke with some lobs early on the overplay.
We have matchup problems, primarily, no one on our roster can stay in front of Irving. He will get into the lane and find open jump shooters on the wings. Duke would rather take 3 point shots than dunks. Our best hope on Irving is that K puts him on Kalin and that Kalin muscles him into foul trouble. Irving has shown a propensity to hack. Duke gets thin behind him at point guard. Nolan Smith is a 2 guard by trade.
For all our hand-wringing, they have no one to match the skill set of the Dancing Bear. Green could give them a ton of problems. Look for an At Illinois style performance from #23.
As usual, our X factor is Summers. Rell could easily score 20 in a game like this, and do some Ager-esque posterizing. If he’s hopping, we have a shot. I also think Appling could have his arrival party in this game. The pace will suit him.
Duke will try to bury us in the first 10 minutes, calling to mind the Ghosts of UNC Past. If we survive the initial blitz, keep Green on the floor, and keep our wits about us, we can hang with these guys. Beat them? I don’t know. But all streaks end. We have a puncher’s chance.
What the hell? We’re due to play a really, really good game. May as well be tomorrow. Go Green.
by rook34 on Nov 30, 2010 10:10 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
Rec'ed for editorial balance
Fight for The Only Colors: Green and White!
by KJ@theonlycolors on Nov 30, 2010 10:13 PM CST up reply actions
Big Ten up 4-2 (assuming Illinois holds on)
That means tomorrow we only need two wins from Purdue, Indiana, Penn St, Wisconsin, or us. I think the odds are good the Big Ten has it locked up by then, but there is a very real possibility it could come down to us.
Random Thoughts reply
Both lIllinois and OSU ooked pretty good tonight.
Anyone else notice the Illinois fans dropping an “overrated” chant at UNC, despite the fact that if I am not mistaken UNC is currently not rated. Though maybe that was an intentional dig. You are unranked and yet you are still overrated.
Also, Kemba Walker dropped 30 again. So maybe we can cut our guys some slack for their struggles to contain him at least. I have no such justification for why we let the PG’s from South Carolina and Chaminade to run rampant, but I think Walker might just be that good. I think Lucious is going to really important in this game defensively. To the naked eye I thought he did the best job playing perimeter defense most of the time. Like his offense, he sometimes seems to lose focus and make a poor mistake on D, but I think he has the potential to be our best perimeter defender. Especially with Kalin not quite at 100 percent yet (I think the injury has affected his defense more than his offense).
I don’t think the blueprint has changed for us against Duke, we just need to execute it better. Still think we are going to rely on Lucas, Summers and Green to be the primary offensive options, and hope that our other perimeter guys knock down open shots to provide help, and the front court gets some scores off of offensive rebounds (we really need this to start happening).
I’m not overly optimistic about going on the road to beat Duke. They are very, very good, and frankly they just don’t lose at home that often. But I sort of agree that this team is due to play a better game, and should stay in it.
by trivialstuff16 on Nov 30, 2010 10:42 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
They weren't dropping the overrated chant on UNC as a whole...
it was for Harrison Barnes — the chant only went on when he was shooting free throws or holding the ball.
lucious and summers
need to be better. lucious needs to not make terrible passes. and summers needs to assertive himself. id have to agree with just about everything else you mention here along with what rook34 said above.
watching durrell play this year makes me wonder how he ever contimplated going to the nba. he looks complacent, and boring. he needs to get the ball and show people why hes the best player on the floor. take it to the hoop, stop and pop, throw down dunks over singler.
i really would like to see us play a complete game even if we lose. after watching tennessee tech, im not sure we have it in us right now.
Nice write up
I think you hit all the points on the head. I have the good fortune of attending tonight’s game (MSU undergrad, currently a Duke grad student), so look for the guy in the MSU t shirt in the heart of the Cameron Crazies. Should be an interesting experience…
I’ve seen Duke play in person a few times this year, and they are scary good. Irving is the player that impresses me the most. Shades of Chris Paul….a real do everything guard. Their bigs are obviously solid, but not that imposing. I’d like to see a few buckets from Sherman early (he’s shown he is capable…), then a lot of angry rebounding from everyone else.
I keep preparing myself for a UNC style beat down (get down 10+ very early, the game is over before it starts, and I subject myself to a long night of heckling), but who knows….we’ve got the players and coach to beat anyone in the country on any given night. Why not tonight?
Go Green!
not really feeling the duke hate
I mean, JJ Redick doesn’t play for them anymore…
But, seriously, when I see Duke today, I just see a really good team. Top recruits. Well coached. Consistent. Character. Some of these things I don’t currently see in what I think are more hateable teams: UNC and Kentucky. Let the flaming begin!
This isn’t to say I cheer for Duke… you’ll certainly see a smile on my face any time they lose, unless it is to the aforementioned teams. (And maybe Kansas).
I like to reserve subtle profanities for our instate rival, but that’s just me!
Hoping
I have to miss the first half hour of the game tonight. I hope we are still in it when get home. There have been moments this year where our spacing and ball movement have been terrific, and every time we do that, something positive happens. I’d love to see some consistency in that regard tonight. If we can keep it close, we can ride a wave of confidence. If things begin unraveling, I hope that Izzo makes judicious use of his timeouts, rather than holding onto them until the end when they would be worthless if the game gets away.
+1
I always feel like he waits a few plays long to use his TOs. As shaky as this team is with ball-handling, I really think he needs to nip any potential Duke runs in the bud.
Rotation
Agree 110% that Green needs to be starting. I just don’t see the benefit of having Thornton in for the first 2-3 minutes, getting replaced by Green, and then sitting on the bench for about the next 12 minutes. I think we need to accept and embrace the fact that our Big 3 this year is Lucas, Summers, and Green. Those guys need to start, they need to play the most minutes, and they will determine how far this team goes. Figure out the rest of the rotation around those guys – who you want in there as bigs, whether you want to go small with them, how you sub them in and out, etc.
Also, it will be nice for us to finally play an ACC/Big10 Challenge game at Breslin again, since this is now the 3rd year in a row we’ve played somewhere else (Ford Field, @UNC, @Duke).
"You can look at the dinosaur that weighs you down or you can look at the big pot of gold (and) try to say, 'You know what? I'm going to try to live up to expectations.' " -Tom Izzo, Iron Mountain Philosopher
I think you just about covered it
Going toward the basket on offense will be key. Duke is vulnerable to back door cuts and such because their emphasis is on pressuring the perimeter. I hope Izzo has some sets that are initiated by Lucas (and maybe Appling or Summers) driving early in the set. Anything that involves multiple passes around the perimeter to set up the offense is a recipe for disaster. We need to attack early with the dribble and look for backdoor cutters for alley oops.
The trick is to be careful not to get caught charging – Duke coaches taking charges/flopping. It is IMO a rather underhanded way of playing defense, although I guess it is within the rules. Sliding to take charges is the only thing that allows them to pressure on the perimeter like they do and not get killed by guards who can take defenders off the dribble to score and/or distribute to backdoor cutters.
They will get those calls at home if the defender is even close to having position, so we need to be careful not to go bulling toward the basket. Lucas is good at sliding sideways at the end of drives to pull the defender out of position and avoid the charge. Summers has many fine qualities, but does have a propensity to telegraph his drives and get called for charging as a result. He’ll need to pull up rather than go for the monster jam when the defender has position, or he’ll wind up in foul trouble in short order. One problem is his leaping ability – in theory if the defender establishes position after he leaves his feet, a charge should not be called, but the refs rarely call it that way. They also still call charging when the defender is under the basket.
Getting Sherman going and Roe playing like he did against South Carolina would make things a lot easier for us. We’re not going to match their 3 point shooting (although we are good this year) so our bigs will have to contribute on the offensive end.
Defensively, as you note, priority number one is closing out on their shooters. They don’t have any really scary scorers in the paint – Roe/Green/Sherman should be OK there, so the other guys will have to focus on staying out on their shooters. Also, forcing them to one shot and done possessions will be key so this would be a good game for us to reassert our normal dominance on the boards.
Good point re: avoiding charges
May ultimately come down to mid-range game off interior passes once Lucas/Green break things down with the initial drive.
Fight for The Only Colors: Green and White!
by KJ@theonlycolors on Dec 1, 2010 9:19 AM CST up reply actions
That's the beauty of the Duke D
They force you to either beat them with midrange shots (the least effective offense there is) or use crisp interior passing to get backdoor cuts. You really have to be careful around the basket. I don’t like their defensive tactics but they are effective. I do think the flopping is one of the reasons they are so hated beyond all reason by much of the rest of the country. It may be legal, but a lot of people don’t think it’s exactly ethical.
by TheCrestedHelm on Dec 1, 2010 10:50 AM CST up reply actions
Eh
I think you’d be right, if not for one thing: It seems these days that if you don’t flop when there actually is a valid offensive foul, you get called for the blocking foul. So it forces you to flop even more. (I’ve seen that a bunch this year, where a player is planted, an opposing player goes into him while shooting,, and the planted player doesn’t go down but just stumbles a little backwards…and gets called for the foul despite doing everything right).
(Also, while I agree a lot of people don’t like it, “unethical” is the wrong word. Unethical is paying a player to come to your school. Taking a charge with the aid of a flop is a legal action, that has no “ethical” issues.)
Fine, call it underhanded, irritating, cunning, devious, or shady if you prefer
people still don’t like it. I agree that you may have to flop to draw an offensive foul, but Duke seems to do it more than anyone else.
by TheCrestedHelm on Dec 1, 2010 11:13 AM CST up reply actions
No one flops more than Wisconsin.
Those guys probably fall down and look for an official when someone bumps them going to class.
by rook34 on Dec 1, 2010 11:39 AM CST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
"Unsportsmanlike"
It is a strategy which deliberately seeks to exploit an area of the rules for which enforcement is notoriously difficult and/or irregular, thus obtaining an advantage that is unmerited.
That is why I find flopping—indeed, any offense which is largely based upon drawing fouls—distasteful.
Duke fan here
This should be an interesting game. One minor note off of your preview is that Seth Curry and Andre Dawkins both come off the bench, with Dawkins getting seemingly slightly more time than Curry. Regardless, since MSU doesn’t play zone, I expect the big lineup a little more here.
Should be a fun game. I think Duke will win, due to my own bias, how well we’re playing, and the fact that MSU seems recently to take a longer time to get really into a roll. But you guys always get it together by the most important time, so that last bit really isn’t that important. Still, Duke has shown vulnerabilities this season, though the media would pretend we’re invincible. Last game vs Oregon (yes we won by 28) was mired by about 30 minutes of really sloppy basketball, as was the Marquettte game in the preseason tournament. This is a team that at times is just confused by how fast a tempo we play and thus results in bad passes, sloppy turnovers, and bad shots (We’re in the top 25 of tempo this year, whereas last year we were #243 in tempo. BIG DIFFERENCE). If MSU capitalizes on those spurts of sloppiness, Duke will be in trouble.
Good luck to y’all, I always like MSU. Izzo does everything right in coaching, unlike some other coaches these days and his teams play great basketball. I truly hope after this game that you win every game up till the tournament.
Mighty kindly of y'all
Shucks, this matchup should have been the NC game, last April. I agree that turnovers will be the key for both teams and Durrell will have to play like MoPete at Chapel Hill. Y’all post back now, hear.
Listening Displeasure
I plan to listen to Will and Matt online with the TV on mute but I’m afraid mute might not be enough to contain that annoying bald guy on ESPN that loves him some Duke.
Is there a more extreme measure that can somehow quiet all of that insane yelling?
Also, that was very nice of garik16 from the Dukeside. One day Sparty will blister teams in Nov and Dec and one of us can sympathy post on a nonconference rival site.
We are who they thought we were.
noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
It’s bad enough when he does our games NOT against Duke and all he does is talk about Duke.
luttez pour les seuls couleurs, vert et blanc
by vert_et_blanc on Dec 1, 2010 1:42 PM CST up reply actions
FTR: Duke fans don't like him either.
(Also, he loves Carolina seemingly just as much, who he hypes up during other games just depends upon who’s #1 at the time).
But yeah, we don’t like him either. We’d prefer Bobby Knight as the color guy.
I like Bilas
Knight is a great analyst but has all the emotion of a dead mackerel.
by TheCrestedHelm on Dec 1, 2010 2:12 PM CST up reply actions
I think Knight is still bitter about how he got out of the business.
Duke fans don’t love Bilas, because it seems at times that he’ll deliberately pick against Duke to try and show that he isn’t biassed against Duke.
I’m not saying this is true. In fact, Bilas has come onto the major Duke message board (Dukebasketballreport.com) to defend himself from such accusations. But it’s the perception.
But at least he’s no Hubie Davis, who is a blatant UNC homer. Yuck.
As much as it pains me to agree with a Duke fan...
I like Knight as well. Bilas is fine, but Knight knows the game of basketball as well as anyone alive and I always feel like I learn something new.
Besides, despite being a Duke fan, garik16 seems like a reasonable chap.
Most of us are reasonable
You’re thinking of Maryland fans, who celebrate both winning and losing by rioting and burning cars.
I think garik16 is reasonable
and I had no idea Bilas was accused of anti-Duke bias. If true, that would be a reason for Duke fans to dislike him for sure.
I like Knight as an analyst and appreciate the knowledge he imparts. He really is on his own level in terms of explaining tactics, matchups, and X’s and O’s. It’s just that I like some emotion from my analyst, and he provides absolutely none. He’s like a Borg. I’ll grant that a color commentator can provide too much emotion (see: Dicky V) but Knight provides too little for my taste.
I live in the DC area and garik is right about Maryland fans. Hopefully we can all agree that they are crazy. Despite picking on their defensive tactics a little bit, I actually don’t have much animosity toward Duke. They’re clean, they get good kids, they play hard, and they win the right way for the most part. If they could cut down on the flopping that would be nice, but there is much to admire about their program. I still want to beat them though, more for what it would say about where our team is than because I hate them.
by TheCrestedHelm on Dec 1, 2010 4:10 PM CST up reply actions
Lessons from last year
The only team to beat Duke shooting jump shots last year was Wisconsin, and they had to combine that with committing only 4 turnovers in the game and getting 33% of their own misses back. In the Kohl Center. This is not a formula MSU is going to be able to emulate. Especially the Kohl Center part.
The teams that beat Duke did it, for the most part, by getting 40% or more of their field goal attempts on dunks or layups and getting to the free-throw line. Georgetown was the model for this formula when they blew out the Devils in January by shooting 72% from the field, thanks to getting layups and dunks on 63% of their shots. Of course, once again, it won’t be possible to replicate having the U.S. President in attendance as part of a raucous home crowd.
If MSU can take a majority of high percentage shots, get to the line, maybe get Singler in foul trouble and hold Duke to a merely-mortal three-point percentage of 35% or less, I think there’s a chance. Unfortunately that hasn’t really been the Spartans’ approach this year: they’ve mostly relied on jump-shooting to stay in games, which is a dangerous formula in general, but especially so against Duke.
So far, excluding the Chaminade game (no shot chart data), MSU has taken jump shots on 65% of their attempts, hitting 40% of them (data from CBS shot charts). Since they are shooting 39% on threes, that means they’re not doing much better on their long-to-midrange twos. So if they’re not driving the lane looking for layups and fouls, and Duke is taking away the three, it’s going to be very hard to stay even getting 40-ish percent on jumpers, even if Duke is only shooting that manageable 35% from three.
It would probably be a good night to finally get the Garrick Sherman coming-out party we’ve seen hints of in the last couple of games.
It's that Princeton Offense Georgetown runs
The main emphasis is on motion and misdirection leading to backdoor cuts – which are the achilles heel of the Duke defense. Hopefully we have some sets that can mimic that offense, because Georgetown put on a clinic on how to beat the Duke D.
by TheCrestedHelm on Dec 1, 2010 12:56 PM CST up reply actions
5,000 bonus points
to whoever writes the lyrics for “The Dawning of the Age of Korie Lucious.”
Fight for The Only Colors: Green and White!
by KJ@theonlycolors on Dec 1, 2010 1:58 PM CST up reply actions
Why not Garrick Sherman?
His name has four sylables too, like Aquarius. So does Kalin Lucas for that matter.
by TheCrestedHelm on Dec 1, 2010 2:30 PM CST up reply actions
I was thinking Aquar-ius and Korie Luc-ious
Poetic license and all that.
Fight for The Only Colors: Green and White!
by KJ@theonlycolors on Dec 1, 2010 2:37 PM CST up reply actions
I think of everyone
KL2 is my X-factor. We know what we will get from Lucas and Green. Solid contributions from Roe, Sherm, Nix, and the pair of frosh will all be useful if not required. Summers is clearly going to have to be a factor, but I think this game rests on Korie’s shoulders.
With Lucas still recovering, and Appling not a primary ball-handler (and playing his first REAL away game in a hostile environment) Lucious is going to have to take care of the ball. Another 3+ turnover game from him and I don’t see anyway we win. Combine that with the need for his speed on defense against Irving, and his shooting/slash driving ability against a very good Duke D. I think this could be the game Lucious shows all of us we have no reason to fear about the PG position next year. Maybe this is just me being optimistic, but on the other hand, if we get a 1-6 shooting performance combined with poor ball-handling and defensive lapses, I don’t see any way MSU even stays in this game, let alone wins.
Mascot based prediction MSU vs. Duke
Mascot Offense:
Duke – The devil (i.e. The Devil, Satan, Lucifer, Prince of Darkness, Ed Hightower) is believed be a powerful, supernatural entity that is the personification of evil and the enemy of God and humankind. This describes Christian Laettner remarkably well.
The term "blue devils" dates back to the late 1700’s, refers to melancholy and sadness, and is the etymological basis for the name of the music genre the blues Based on this, it can be assumed that Duke’s players will spend much of the game voicing their complaints about the harsh realities of life: unforced turnovers, unfair officiating, the oppression of stifling Spartan defense, and generic hard times.
In terms of offense, Satan appears to have some pretty formidable skills, including his ability to stab stuff with a pitchfork and imprison people in hell…for-ev-er. However, it is unclear if Beelzebub can hit a jumpshot.
Michigan State – Spears and swords.
Advantage: Duke, because a pitchfork is basically a spear but with more of those pointy things at the end.
Mascot Defense:
Duke – The Devil appears to be pretty much invincible unless tossed into a lake of fire. On the bright side, Charlie Daniels reports that the lord of the underworld has a bit of a gambling addiction and is likely to award golden plated musical instruments if bested in a competition.
Michigan State – Tom Izzo already has a gold-plated accordion and is not likely to engage in any such wagers.
Advantage: Duke. A quick search on Google Maps for "lake of fire" near Cameron Indoor Stadium didn’t come up with much. Bummer.
Coaching:
Duke – Mike Krzyzewski (Ker-zee-zoo-ski) has never lost to a team coached by one of his former players. Also, Mike Krzyzewski has never lost to lots of other teams.
Michigan State – Tom Izzo played point guard at Northern Michigan University and was NOT coached by Mike Krzyzewski. Also, there is a Jay-Z about Tom Izzo. It is entitled “Money Ain’t a Thang” and features Jermaine Dupri.
Advantage: Michigan State because Tom Izzo is not the most hated coach in the history of college basketball, which has got to count for something.
Unexpected Mascot Origin Similarities:
Duke – At the end of World War I, the Duke student newspaper launched a campaign to create a new mascot. However, during the 1922–1923 academic year, campus student leaders and the editors of two other student publications decided that the newspaper staff should decide the name on their own because the nomination process had proved inconclusive. The editor-in-chief and managing editor began referring to the athletic teams as the Blue Devils. Though the name was not officially used that year, no opposition to the name arose. The newspaper’s staff continued to use the name and eventually "Blue Devils" became the official mascot and nickname.
Michigan State – In 1925, when Michigan State College replaced the name Michigan Agricultural College, the college sponsored a contest to select a nickname to replace “Aggies” and picked “The Michigan Staters.” However, the sports editor of the LSJ decided the name was too cumbersome for newspaper writing and vowed to find a better one. This editor went through the entries and decided upon the entry name of "Spartans". Once the paper started using it, no one called to complain and eventually the name stuck.
Prediction: There is nice way to say this: Duke is pure evil. Everyone knows that good always conquers evil in the end, but this is not the end. It’s game #7 so…Duke 84, MSU 69.
by Pete Alderman on Dec 1, 2010 3:32 PM CST reply actions 4 recs
Shields, we have shields
and armor. That should count for something on defense.
by TheCrestedHelm on Dec 1, 2010 4:16 PM CST up reply actions
KL2
I’d like to see him get some burn as the off-guard tonight instead of KL when they are both on the court. I think he can be a little more effective from there and allow KL to find Summers and Roe on backdoor cuts.
FWIW,
Izzo had an interview on BTN today from Durham in which he said that moving Lucas to the off guard more in Maui was a function of trying to save some wear and tear on his body.
Fight for The Only Colors: Green and White!
by KJ@theonlycolors on Dec 1, 2010 6:03 PM CST up reply actions
4 hours till game time
give or take 10 minutes. Time always seems to sprint when you want it to walk and crawl when you want it to sprint.
hoping for a decent show by Sparty ..but have to mute the TV though.
can’t stand Dickie V and his love for Duke. We might have to go for numerous TV timeouts after the camera spots Dickie V charging at the Duke bench and starts making love with Coach K.
Only Dickie V can talk about Duke and North Carolina in a discussion of a game like MSU-Wisconsin. Both are at least 800 miles from NCarolina State line…but close to Dickie V!
Doris Burke i think is learning from him.
During UVA-Minnesota, she was talking TCU and Big East Basketball.
Ummmm yeah.
Wow...
Anyone else see that MSU is the last ranked team on Duke’s schedule?
Wow.. for supposedly having such a great team their schedule is surprisingly weak. They could end up going undefeated in the regular season with a win tonight.
Well,
they still Butler, the defending national champions. And it’s not really their fault the rest of the ACC is so weak this year.
I certainly wouldn’t say Duke went out its way to schedule a weak slate of foes: Kansas St, MSU, Butler.
Fight for The Only Colors: Green and White!
by KJ@theonlycolors on Dec 1, 2010 6:39 PM CST up reply actions
Fair enough...
still – Dec1st being your last scheduled ranked team? Their fault or not – it’s pretty weak.
Eh, normally the ACC is a tough schedule.
Butler was ranked to start the season, and St. Johns and Temple either have been ranked at some point this season or might be in the case of st johns.
Correction
Butler was the national runner-up, obviously.
Fight for The Only Colors: Green and White!
by KJ@theonlycolors on Dec 1, 2010 7:08 PM CST up reply actions
Well...
stUNC or is it fUNC has to be ranked again at some point right? I mean they do have the second coming of Oscar Robertson heading their freshman class and all.
We are who they thought we were.

by 





















