Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Falling Action: Best, Worst of UFC on FUEL TV 3

Big Ten Football Picks, Week 10: Where I Throw Darts at a Board and Pretend Like I Know What I'm Doing

Your normal wagerin' sage -- Pete, of course -- is otherwise occupied this morning, so your picks this week come from a guy whose experience with sports betting consists of mooching a few free drinks in the Wynn sportsbook a couple years ago.  So, caveat bettor.  Pete went 4-1 straight up last week, and 2-2-1 ATS.  Northwestern vs. Indiana, Pete's lock of the week, was a push.  (Let's hope that Pete wasn't in a "ties lose" parlor.)  The miss of the week -- Michigan at Penn State -- was a loss.  Anyway, let's see if I can do any better.  (Doubtful.)

ILLINOIS AT MICHIGAN (-3) -- LOCK OF THE WEEK.

How in the world is Michigan favored in this game?  In one corner, you've got Illinois, whose three losses are to teams with a combined 23-3 record.  In the other, you've got Michigan, owners of the nation's most schadenfreude-inducing defense -- and one which just got worse, as another secondary starter (J.T. Floyd) went down to injury.  I can think of three reasons for the spread.  First, the game is in Ann Arbor.  But Michigan has dropped its last two games there.  Two, Michigan's defensive weakness is against the pass, and Illinois' freshman quarterback may be ill-equipped to take advantage of that.  But Nathan Scheelhaase threw for 204 yards, 3 touchdowns, and no interceptions against Purdue, and he's getting better last week.  Besides, the Michigan run defense isn't good either, and Mikel Leshoure is certainly good enough to gash them.  Third, Ron Zook.  But it's becoming quite apparent that Zook has turned most of the game coaching over to two new, competent coordinators, so the Zook factor has been minimized.  Don't overthink this one.  Take Illinois and the points.

Straight up and spread picks: Illinois.

More, after the jump.

Star-divide

IOWA AT INDIANA (+17)

You may remember what a wild game this was last season: when Ricky Stanzi threw roughly 11 pick-sixes, Indiana led by 14 in the third quarter, and Iowa still won by 18.  Indiana showed a brief bit of competency against Michigan but has been terrible otherwise.  Iowa, as we saw last week, is still good, and Stanzi is going to slash and burn through the Indiana secondary.  Similarly, Iowa's defense is good enough to hold the sometimes-explosive Indiana passing offense in check.  From time to time, Iowa ends up in an inexplicably close game, but I doubt it happens here.

Straight up and spread picks: Iowa.

WISCONSIN AT PURDUE (+19.5)

Wisconsin is playing better than any other team in the conference, and Purdue may be playing even worse than Minnesota at the moment.  Illinois easily covered a big spread against Purdue last week, and I have little doubt that Wisconsin will do the same this week.  Given the complete disaster that is the Purdue quarterback situation, it's tough seeing the Boilers scoring more than 10 points.  Will Wisconsin get to 30?  Absolutely.

Straight up and spread picks: Wisconsin.

NORTHWESTERN AT PENN STATE (-6) -- MISS OF THE WEEK.

Tough to get a handle on this one.  Dan Persa will be playing for Northwestern, and he'll probably be effective.  Penn State's linebackers are going to have a tough time containing the Wildcats' short passing game.  But Penn State may have dug itself out of its rut last week.  It's not certain who's going to start at quarterback for PSU (Bolden or McGloin), but Northwestern's defense probably won't be able to shut down either.  We've been waiting all season for Northwestern's usual upset; I'm becoming more skeptical that it'll happen.  They'll keep it close, but Penn State wins.

Straight up pick: Penn State.  Spread pick: Northwestern.

MINNESOTA AT MICHIGAN STATE (-24) . . . full preview tomorrow!

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The only thing scarier than LVS's picks

is that I almost did them instead! Happy late Halloween!

by intrpdtrvlr on Nov 4, 2010 10:20 AM CDT reply actions  

That UofM vs. Illinois line makes zero sense

The crazy thing is that the line hasn’t moved all week. I thought for sure the game would be almost a pickem by weeks end.

by Stones1981 on Nov 4, 2010 11:18 AM CDT reply actions  

It only doesn't make sense...

if you think the line has anything to do with what the odds-makers think will happen in the game. The line is based on what they think will cause a relatively even number of people to bet on each side. Public perception has been that UM is a decent team (thanks to all the overblown Denard Robinson hype) and that Illinois sucks (based straight up on their record – and because their team has sucked the last several years).

Consequently most of the public probably thinks UM is the better team.

by MooTheKow on Nov 4, 2010 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Oh yeah, I definitely get that

I know they odds makers are trying to get betting on both sides of the line. It just seems like a great opportunity for any gambler to put some money on Illinois.

by Stones1981 on Nov 4, 2010 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

MooTheKow has it right

The oddsmakers job is more about understanding bettors than about understanding football.

The sideline is always greener at MSU.

by Green 96 on Nov 4, 2010 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

We should keep in mind

that Michigan does still have a top-five offense nationally. As good as Illinois has looked to date, keeping up with Michigan in a shootout at the Big House with a freshman QB at the helm is not a sure thing.

But, yeah, the line doesn’t look right (Sagarin says Illinois by 3). Vegas/gamblers basically saying they think opponents can’t continue to be as deathly efficient as they have been in tearing through the UM defense.

Fight for The Only Colors: Green and White!

by KJ@theonlycolors on Nov 4, 2010 11:36 AM CDT reply actions  

No they do not.

Michigan has a ton of offensive stats against a horribly weak non-conference schedule and Indiana, other than that they are merely above average.

Denard is first for rushing yards, but he’s not in the top 5 for rushing or passing TD’s.

UM is 20th in total points and points per game, MSU is 22nd in total points.

I’m not predicting that Illinois will shut them out, but I’m seeing another UM game with a lot of yards between the 20’s but an inability to keep up.

P.S. I agree that the spot is a function of betting distribution, not the possible outcome of the game.

by Chris1992 on Nov 4, 2010 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

Illinois is very tough to run on and when Denard has to throw, he tends to falter. Sheelhaase should have a big day against their pylon secondary.

by MSU1978 on Nov 4, 2010 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Disagree

Both FO stats, which are adjusted for opponent strength and remove garbage-time numbers, have UM as a top-5 offense.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/feioff2010

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaaoff

MSU is the only team to hold Michigan under 28 points this season.

Their defense is just that bad. Question is whether they can “sustain” that level of badness.

Fight for The Only Colors: Green and White!

by KJ@theonlycolors on Nov 4, 2010 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Iowa was up 28 - 7 in a prevent defense throughout the fourth quarter

Yes, I know they can score,, their badness is the question and J. T. Floyd is out for the season. UMass scored 37, Indiana 35, Iowa 38, and JoePa 41. I would bet you a beer, if we frequented the same watering hole.

by MSU1978 on Nov 4, 2010 6:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not disputing quality of defense or fact Illinois should be favored.

Just saying their offense is completely for real, as evidenced by every statistical indicator available, including some pretty advanced ones.

Fight for The Only Colors: Green and White!

by KJ@theonlycolors on Nov 4, 2010 6:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oregon Offense ranked at 14 means your stats are bad.

I’m sure they did some cool things with their spreadsheet but it’s full of assumptions about which stat is more important than another and which teams are good or bad, or which drives at the end of the game are garbage and which are not.

by Chris1992 on Nov 5, 2010 3:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Illinois at Michigan: If I may borrow some terms from Bill Simmons, Scheelhaase is a poor man’s Denard at best. But a homeless man’s Denard would tear Michigan’s defense to bits. Illinois wins straight up.

Iowa at Indiana: Iowa wins this, but I think Indiana puts up just enough to squeak under the spread. I see this as about a 14-point game.

Wisconsin at Purdue: This might be an entertaining game if not for Angry Purdue Knee-Hating God’s exploits earlier this season. Wisconsin covers.

NW at Penn State: Hard to make sense of Penn State; yes, they hung 41 on Michigan but that’s not especially hard. Easier to make sense of NW: it’s going to be a close game, period. I’d take NW and the points, and I’m sorely tempted to take them to win outright.

Minn at MSU: The optimist in me says we come out angry and grind the Gophers into a fine powder. The pessimist hasn’t forgotten the JLS era – although even that part of me thinks we’ll win.

by SpartanDan on Nov 4, 2010 7:12 PM CDT reply actions  

Denard is a Poor Man's Scheelhaase

I’m feeling very contrarian today, but I don’t see Scheelhaase as having the same run first instinct, which I think will lead to more success over time.

Denard is Dominique Wilkins…all big stats, no big wins.

Cousins, Stanzi, Tolzein – Pocket passers with a little mobility.

Persa, Robinson – Run first QB’s.

Ok, Pryor messes with my little comparison, but he is becoming more of a pocket passer.

Can you recruit top tier RB’s and WR’s to a team where one guy hogs all the stats? Does Denard even consider passing or handing off when they have the ball inside the 5?

by Chris1992 on Nov 5, 2010 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Michigan State basketball and football blog community

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Help the Big 10 represent and beat the SEC!
Small
Boise State 2012 Preview
Dawson-michigan-state-600x370_small
The Double Standard in SI's Power Rankings
Dawson-michigan-state-600x370_small
Adreian not Bringing the Payne?
Delvonduck_small
MSU Spring Game Fantasy Contest!
Small
Thank Goodness Adreian Payne is OK
200_small
You're a mean one, Mr. Ryan
Small
Snapper Signing Hits the Double Bonus
Small
Derrick Nix arrested and suspended
Sparty_statue2_small
You Better Believe I'll Take It

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Petenewpic_small Pete Rossman

Spiritofd_small LVS

Contributors

Square_sun_small Steve Hendershot

Marvin_small SpartanDan

State_small Con-T

Adorno5_small intrpdtrvlr

Ph2_small patrick_hayes

Spartan_troll_face_2_small HeckDorland

Mug_vanini_chris__2__small ChrisVannini