Defense FAIL: Purdue 76, Michigan State 64
So if I'd told you before the game that Kalin Lucas would be healthy enough to play 29 minutes (and score 12 points on just 6 field goal attempts) and MSU would only turn the ball over 9 times in 64 possessions, you'd have felt pretty good about the likely outcome of the game, no?
As it turns out, though, the largest term in my "fear/paranoia level equation" wasn't turnovers, it was "even Tom Izzo can't gameplan for three reliable scorers." E'Twaun Moore, JaJuan Johnson, and Robbie Hummel combined to light the MSU defense up for 59 points on just 37 FG attempts. The MSU defense had no answers at all for Johnson inside or Moore outside, and per usual Hummel picked his spots with precision (5 assists vs. 1 turnover to go with his 15 points).
It's hard to even separate out how much of Purdue's offensive explosion (47 points in the first half) was them making good plays vs. MSU being out of synch defensively. It just all fit together into neat package of Boilermaker dominance.
Remarkably, MSU actually won three of the four factors tonight:
The Spartans attempted an extra 12 shots from the field and an extra 8 shots from the line, but still managed to lose by 12 points. That's a function of a 27-point gap in eFG% and a 14-point gap in FT%.
Offensively, MSU actually managed to get to (exactly) a point per possession. But the inability to score around the basket prevented them from keeping up with Purdue's offensive onslaught. Draymond Green, Raymar Morgan, and Delvon Roe combined to shoot 3 for 23 from the field. Green was completely out of whack shooting the ball (1-13) and Morgan and Roe were flummoxed by Johnson's presence inside, climaxing in Morgan's missed dunk from under the basket.
There were, I thought, three bright spots on offense (in addition to Lucas looking much closer to 100% than expected):
- Korie Lucious bounced back from his horrid showing in Champaign to make some solid plays in this game. 9 points, 2 assists, 1 turnover, and 2 steals. He didn't force passes to the wings like he did against Illinois, and he played some great extended defense, scoring two break away layups off the steals. Unfortunately, he also blew a fast break opportunity that killed some momentum MSU had going.
- I give credit to Delvon Roe for adjusting his game after it became clear he couldn't score against Johnson in the first half. In the second half, he looked to pass out of the post, picking up 2 assists on passes to shooters beyond the 3-point arc. Also picked a good spot to attack the rim for a 3-point play to pull MSU within 10.
- Chris Allen was the only reason MSU even had a chance to claw its way back within striking distance in the second half. 21 points on 13 FG attempts. Maybe, must maybe, playing without Lucas as the offensive go-to guy for a couple games has finally pushed Allen over the top toward becoming a second reliable perimeter scorer.
I'm going to assume that Durrell Summers' second-half benching was a result of defensive breakdowns. He was ineffective on offense in the first half, but not distastrously so: 2 missed shots, 2 offensive rebounds, 1 assist, 1 turnover.
Tom Izzo said this was the best crowd at Breslin in a couple years. I think he was exaggerating a little bit, but the crowd was definitely a boost when the team finally got things going late in the game. The absolute low point of the game came at one point in the early part of the second half when the Breslin staff put up the 300 "hoo, hoo, hoo" clip on the video screen to try to get the crowd going a little bit. Except they started it too late and had to cut out just as Gerard Butler was yelling, "Spar-." MSU then proceeded to turn the ball over when Allen took the ball down the court--despite the presence of both Lucas and Lucious in the lineup--and misdribbled it as he crossed the halfcourt line to turn the ball over.
We can only hope that that moment was the worst moment in what will turn out to be the worst game of the season. The three teams now tied with us (in the loss column) at the top of the Big Ten standings all picked up their three losses in quick succession (3-game losing streaks for Purdue and Illinois, 3 losses in 4 games for Ohio State). The question is whether MSU can bounce back from their losses the way those three teams did. With Wisconsin now looking human--but still in the best position of any 5th-place team in the country--the Big Ten race promises to be one heckuva scrum coming down the home stretch (blogging at 1:30 a.m. = mixed sports metaphors).
Time to start thinking optimistically, I say. After as gruesome a three-game stretch as we've seen in a long time, we remain in position to control our own destiny for winning at least a share of the conference title. SpartanDan:
We didn’t win the first nine by accident, and there’s no way we lose all of the last three with a healthy Lucas. Won’t be easy – our margin for error is totally gone – but 5-1 is still possible and that would get us a share (unless you think Purdue or OSU is winning out, and I don’t). If we can remember how to defend – we weren’t anywhere near this bad at it earlier – we can get there.
Next up: A road trip to take on winless Penn State. Saturday at noon. ESPN.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
@Penn State scares me...
PSU actually been pretty close in a lot of their losses. I’m pretty sure they’re going to want to come out and kick MSU while they’re down… they’re pretty close to due for a win… hope Battle doesn’t go off on MSU for 40+ and make it 4 straight nationally televised losses.
On the contrary, Penn State keeps finding new ways to lose.
Giving up a 20-point lead against Michigan? Check. Giving up a 17 point lead against Wisconsin? Check. Constantly gacking up chances when IU was close to folding? Check. Losing to Illinois because we have no inside presence. Check. Somehow managing to lose to Iowa? Check. Losing to Minnesota on a 19-foot fadeaway jumper? Check.
"I AM A DIEHARD REDSKINS FAN, CAPS, LEAFS, AND I LOVE WATCHING TENNIS. SO WHATS THE BIG DEAL"
by ReadingRambler on Feb 10, 2010 8:31 AM CST up reply actions
I think I was in mild shock
And I didn’t realize how similar the endings of the last two games were. MSU had fought back to pull within one score late in the game. With the opponent handling the ball and needing to get a stop, MSU was absolutely killed by a 3-pointer by the opponents hottest perimeter player. That’s rough. McCamey, now Moore. Discouraging. We need to slip Travis Walton into a jersey or something.
So true
Although there have been bright moments on defense, they seem to disappear when we need them the most. I can’t help but feel that every time an opponent spots up for a three, we go through the motions on contesting the shot… rather than actually defending it. I understand the premise of not falling for the headfake and losing position… but time and time again we give practically uncontested threes. Very frustrating.
lousy game
I don’t think I can remember a game in recent years with such lousy defense. People have commented on Summers’ passiveness, but Roe’s defense was also terrible, and Lucious no better. Allen has gotten a lot better, though the killer three off of a ball screen at the end to restore a Purdue 6 point lead, was largely his fault. Green helps out well and comes up with some big plays, but he also tends to lose his man at critical junctures. Morgan is the only one who seems completely committed and focused on the defensive side.
But what a lackluster effort! The team seems flat and out of sync. Other than a brief period in the second half, Purdue seemed to come up with every loose ball, and seemed to me both hungrier and more focused. And some players seem really out of it. The number from the box score that I think is most revealing is that Roe had the same number of rebounds as Thornton, despite playing three times more minutes. How is that possible? How can a guy as talented as Roe only get 2 rebounds in 25 minutes on the court?
Purdue was impressive
I was only able to catch the second half (thankfully, it seems) and even seeing the half we “won,” it was easy to see which was the better team: they seemed quicker, they executed their offense well, and save for about a three-minute stretch, they seemed far more composed (and even when we were making our comeback, Day-Day’s block from behind on Johnson saved a dunk on a well-run play, etc.). Moore was able to turn the corner and get into the lane whenever he wanted. I was really impressed by how well they responded in the last three minutes: the crowd was losing their collective minds, we had stolen all the momentum, and they calmly and efficiently put a chokehold on us. Gotta give them props.
So what was up with Summers? I know Izzo is sending a serious message when he chooses to sit one of our more potent—albeit inconsistent—scorers in the biggest game of the year, against the best team in the conference, while our reigning B10 player-of-the-year leader is hobbled. That a coach has to do that at this juncture in tight B10 race is troubling on multiple levels (even more than the whole ‘Kalin got kicked out of practice’ meme to me). I feel like we really need Summers if we’re going to do anything come March.
by RobbingGormanThomas on Feb 10, 2010 8:44 AM CST reply actions
Purdue
I was impressed by Moore, who is quick and strong; Johnson benefited from a great matchup, and again I was less impressed by Hummel, though he is awfully efficient. I think he benefits from the others’ presence on the court, to get these great looks, and he does knock them down. But he can not do much on his own, off the dribble.
I came away really impressed by Painter though. These guys play well together, and the sum is greater than the parts.
I personally think Hummel is what makes JJ and Moore better, not the other way around. He has tremendous basketball IQ, rarely makes a poor pass. He’s able to get it down low to JJ or post it up himself. Last night he was content to pass it up to them (the play in the first half where it looked like he was going to shoot a 3 and then dumped it low to JJ), and it worked out well.
Moore
That was probably the best game of his career last night. he is our go to guy when we need a basket and absolutely owned the game when you cut it to three.
That said, I want no part of you with a healthy Lucas. That kid is a warrior!
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
I was impressed
When Allen hit that three, the game could have gone either way. Purdue could have continued to crumble and watch MSU take it right away from them. Or, Moore could become a ruthless, Spartan-annihilating assassin and crush MSU in two minutes like they were never in the game.
That’s how you do it. Impressive.
It’s partially our weak perimeter D but we’ve had two guys in a row just look like monsters against us.
How does Sherman only get 4 minutes when Johnson is killing us?
I really wanted to see somebody tall enough to disrupt Johnson. And is Herzog no longer on the team? Going into the conference season we looked like a sweet sixteen team because of our porous defense. Were the first 9 conference games an aberration? Izzo has some work to do if this team is going to make a run. I’m not going to be against him though.
re:Herzog
Seems like he is just not an effective option at all. He has rarely seen game action and would’ve been just as lost last night.
by RickTheBloggerMartel on Feb 10, 2010 11:18 AM CST up reply actions
Reasons for optimism
I’m trying to remain optimistic. I am convinced that our Spartans have the talent to play with anybody, but the evidence is mounting that they are unable to maximize that potential. Aside from the away game at Northwestern ( I missed the UMass game), I have yet to see a complete 40 minute effort from this team. We won games against lesser opponents playing 20 – 30 minutes of quality basketball. We can’t win games against quality teams with that sort of effort.
I don’t know what it will take for Morgan to assert himself offensively. A couple of years ago folks were worried that he would bolt to the NBA. He could be unstoppable at times. These days, he has a way of disappearing in the big games. We need12-15 points a game from him. Summers is the manic/depressive on this squad – so much athleticism, so little consistency.
I hope that Izzo will do what he always seems to do and get these guys in synch and hungry by tourney time, but I sure would love to see the hunger, intensity, and intelligence each game during the season.
Don't beat yourselves up Spartan fans.
Listen, MSU is still a top-notch team in the Big Ten. Purdue lost three in a row and so did Illinois. Sometimes these streaks happen even to good teams. MSU gets a couple of easier games now and can sort things out. That’s what Purdue did and look at them now.
Draymond Green's Passing
I know the guy has been money lately but does it seem like he is now trying too hard? It is almost like he is trying to pass the ball into impossible spaces now.
He still has been making some great reads but it is becoming more common to have him overthrow or make an awkward pass than it is making a great decision.
by RickTheBloggerMartel on Feb 10, 2010 11:21 AM CST reply actions
Better that than sleepwalking
Even Green’s bad games fill the stat sheet (6 pts, 7 boards, 2 assists, 1 monster block). Morgan and Summers just go AWOL every so often (lately, more often than not).
The Crowd
I went to the Purdue game, first time at the Breslin in many years. To be honest, I was less than impressed with the crowd. The student section, and most of the upper deck were loud, but the rest of the lower bowl, where all the big money alumni sit, was pretty dead. I was in the 19th row behind the basket and people around me were looking at me funny whenever I’d stand up or make some noise.
Seems to me like the alumni pretty much rely on the Izzone to make all the noise, so they can sit back on their hands and act like opera viewers. If you want to sit comfortably, watch the game at home!
We forced a surprising number of turnovers
over 21% for an Izzo team is pretty ouside the norm. What did us in was an inability to hit shots and an inability to keep them from hitting shots. Everything else went according to plan but there is no way to make up that large a margin in eFG%. We seem to have a problem with defending the pick and roll because the big who flashes to cover on the switch is getting lost. Teams are exploiting it as they never have before, which indicates that we are not executing well rather than that the defensive scheme isn’t sound. It appears that opposing coaches are seeing something in our execution that they can exploit, and that will be an issue until we correct it.
by TheCrestedHelm on Feb 12, 2010 10:33 AM CST reply actions

by 



















