Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ellenberger vs. Sanchez Heats Up, Hughes Talks Retirement

Linking Laconically Wants More Corn

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

There's actually a good discussion on Nebraska

happening over at Black Shoe Diaries. The “TV” angle being overlooked in the Nebraska vs. Missouri debate is the following. Missouri brings you Kansas City (although KU and KSU have their fair share of this market) and St. Louis (which also has a strong Illinois presence). Nebraska brings you an entire state (granted, a small one) devoid of split-allegiances, but they also bring something Missouri cant; a National Brand.

Alabama and Oklahoma are “small market” schools, but they make big ratings splashes because they are a historically recognized football powers. Say the word “Nebraska” to someone on either coast and either corn, Bruce Springsteen or football will pop into their mind. Do the same with “Missouri” and I promise sports won’t instantly register with the ever-lusted-for Average American. Nebraska is a big football/ratings plus over Mizzou. Academically, though…

Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.

by Kyle McCann't on Feb 15, 2010 12:55 PM CST reply actions  

This

It depends on what they want to go for, potential audience or current audience. Nebraska seems like it brings current audience, versus the potential that Missouri could bring if it grew in popularity. Nebraska is probably close to the realistic height of its popularity.

Personally, I’d rather add Nebraska than Pitt just for geographical balance.

You could have:
West:
Nebraska
Iowa
Minnesota
Illinois
Wisconsin
Northwestern

East:
Indiana
Purdue
MSU
Michigan
OSU
PSU

by witless chum on Feb 15, 2010 1:09 PM CST up reply actions  

I would argue

that Nebraska is nowhere near the height of their popularity. Go back to the early/mid 90’s and you heard Nebraska discussed the way we currently talk about Oklahoma (except they actually won their big games). I just don’t see Missouri as meeting that “Penn State Standard” for expansion. I’m not sure Nebraska does either, but it’s a hell of a lot closer.

Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.

by Kyle McCann't on Feb 15, 2010 1:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Another advantage over Texas

Nebraska just has the Oklahoma rivalry they’d need to maintain as an out-of-conference game. And they only play every other year right now.

Texas has Oklahoma, Texas A&M, Texas Tech. Seems like it’d be very hard for their fan base to give up those rivalries on an annual basis.

Fight for The Only Colors: Green and White!

by KJ@theonlycolors on Feb 15, 2010 1:46 PM CST up reply actions  

True

I recognize that, but I don’t think they’ll be returning to Osborne Era popularity ever. They’re still a huge deal in Nebraska and they’re still a name nationally, but the odds would at least be against them ever becoming what they were in those days again.

by witless chum on Feb 15, 2010 2:09 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't know if it's likely, but it's certainly not impossible

Nebraska’s success at the end of the Osborne era wasn’t a flash-in-the-pan. They’re one of the 10 or so true blueblood football programs. Success is always going to bmore difficult for them than a lot of the others because Nebraska isn’t exactly a prime recruiting state, but neither is Oklahoma, for instance. (Yes, they’re closer to Texas. But if the Huskers were able to get some momentum—and I think there’s a decent chance of that with Pelini—I don’t see why they wouldn’t be able to do what Oklahoma does and pluck lots of big recruits from out-of-state.)

Anyway, in terms of the big two sports, Nebraska would be very, very close to Penn State: likely to be a doormat in basketball, but absolute dynamite in football. Like PSU, it’ll stretch the conference geography, but not in a big way. It’d clearly not be the absolute slam dunk that PSU was (PSU has/has better academics, better TV markets, no triggering of conference armageddon in the process, etc.) But aside from Notre Dame, there won’t be any school that is as much of a perfect match as PSU was. Nebraska would probably be one or two notches below, but as far as I’m concerned, that still makes it a good enough fit to pursue seriously.

by LVS on Feb 15, 2010 3:15 PM CST up reply actions  

USC missing...

….here “Saginaw Arthur Hill commit Maurice Jones” along with snark about USC’s general crookedness and moral turpitude. Hopefully Jones is not friendly with Saginaw football recruit DeAnthony Arnett, whom MSU is apparently going to have to contend for against Kiffykins. Given Dantonio’s general recruiting success, it’s not as inconceivable that we’d win as it was when we were trying to get Nick Perry and Ronald Johnson to stay in Michigan.

by witless chum on Feb 15, 2010 2:13 PM CST reply actions  

Fixed.

It was originally “USC commit,” and then I changed it . . . but only half-changed it apparently. Ha.

by LVS on Feb 15, 2010 2:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Korie Lucious was apparently left at home for skipping classes. At least, that’s what I heard.

by Ozymandias on Feb 15, 2010 3:34 PM CST reply actions  

That was Joe Rexrode's guess.

But as far as I know, nothing was ever confirmed beyond that it was an academic issue.

by LVS on Feb 15, 2010 3:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Michigan State basketball and football blog community

FanPosts


Managers

Petenewpic_small Pete Rossman

Spiritofd_small LVS

Contributors

Square_sun_small Steve Hendershot

Marvin_small SpartanDan

State_small Con-T

Adorno5_small intrpdtrvlr

Patrickhayes_small patrick_hayes

Keep-calm-carry-on_small HeckDorland