A Look at MSU Basketball Recruit Kenny Kaminski
[Autobump. -KJ]
In case there isn’t a 2012 Hotlist on the site soon, I thought it might be good to put up a post about 2012 Medina, OH SF/PF Kenny Kaminski. According to tRCMB, Kaminski recently moved his decision announcement up to June 30 from the original date of July 31st. Earlier this month, he told the Courier-Journal of Southern Indiana that he was "really leaning towards Michigan State." With this constellation of events in mind, MSU fans have reason to be optimistic that Kaminski might be a Spartan this summer.
One of Kenny Kaminski’s strengths is his versatility. While coaches are always looking for inside/outside individuals like Raymar Morgan, most players ultimately end up in a niche of either playing in the post or on the perimeter. Scouts believe that Kaminski can succeed in both roles as an offensive and defensive player at the college level. He is quick enough and solid enough in his ballhandling to work on the perimeter but, at 6’7" 215lbs, his size gives him the ability to score down low and guard bigger players. After watching Kaminski play at the SPIECE tournament on May 2nd, LifeInLansing.com bball blogger St8izGr8 referred to him as "legitimately a combo guy...Indy Elite used him both inside and on the perimeter and he looked comfortable defensively in both spots. He was guarding actual guards at times and hung in there." Also, Kaminski is an excellent shooter and this is regarded as a principle strength of his game. Recently, ESPN had this to say:
Kaminski is an offensive machine and an excellent shooter out to 22 feet with his feet set. When he is aggressive on offense, he can put the ball on the floor and create for himself with two or three dribbles, which is just enough to free himself for his patented jump shot. He has a good basketball IQ and is a good passer -- both inside and on the perimeter. Kaminski also can post up and score on the low block. He prefers to shoot over his opponent or perform short drives off ball fakes to score at the rim. Kaminski is also a decent rebounder, but that is not the main reason he is on the floor.
Considering he has yet to play his junior year of high school basketball, the important aspects of Kenny’s game will likely continue to develop - his strength, ball-handling, rebounding, etc. He'll arrive in college as a big-bodied wing forward who can make moves around the basket but also step out and hit a three.
In addition to Michigan State, Indiana and Ohio State have each offered Kaminski a scholarship but one interview gave the impression that OSU has some catching up to do. Though he has talked about interest from some other schools and the potential for summer visits, the smart money appears to be that this is a two school race between Indiana and MSU with MSU being the team to beat. I, for one, am excited about the prospect of Kenny Kaminski joining the MSU family.
This is a FanPost, written by a member of the TOC community. It does not represent the official positions of The Only Colors, Inc.--largely because we have no official positions.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Looks good, I’d like to see him develop a little more before a full on commital but he seems to be talented. It remains to be seen whether he will be an impact player or a role player though.
Ooonst ooonst muthafucka!
You have a point
Because it’s always a little risky to take a commitment from a player before he’s even started his junior year. One can’t be 100% sure how his development will progress. However, Izzo (and Crean and Matta for that matter) seems sold. Kaminski has a full offer and if he wanted to be a Spartan tomorrow (or June) that route appears available to him. Izzo has been in contact for a long time so it’s nothing they’ve taken lightly.
I think his inside/outside versatility will be the key. MSU has been spoiled by Raymar for the past few years. We might not have a guy like that until 2012 and it’ll be good to have increased flexibility in where people match-up. When st8 made his comment, he was considering guys like Tommy McCune and Jakarr Sampson and came to the conclusion that KK was the real(est) deal combo-forward wise. A “role” perhaps but an advantageous one.
by intrpdtrvlr on May 26, 2010 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Nice post
I like what I’ve seen from Kaminski. In size and skills he seems similar to Russell Byrd, but with more of an inside game as well. He’s listed as a power forward but would probably fit well in Izzo’s system where there are less definite distinctions across the 2-3-4 slots. Kaminski does have two more years to add size as well. Reports from the recent Adidas May Classic in Bloomington have all been very positive. My daughter’s best friend lives in Medina less than an hour from me so maybe I’ll get a chance to check him out in person this coming season.
Mostly speculation on my part
but I bet by the time Kaminski is a college freshman, he’ll be noticeably thicker and even taller than Byrd. You’ll be able to look at them and tell who is the guard and who is the forward. Byrd has really developed his physique but I don’t know that he has the frame that KK does. Also, I’ve heard some speculation that Byrd isn’t actually any taller than Day Day, closer to 6’5" than 6’7" but who knows. I have no firsthand impression on this. But again, I could be wrong. If Alan Anderson and Austin Thornton have played in the post for Izzo, why not Byrd?
I’m a fan of this guy. The most consistent knock I’ve heard is that he’s not an “elite” rebounder. Where better to address that than MSU? I’d love to hear your impression if you get to watch him.
by intrpdtrvlr on May 26, 2010 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions
It will be interesting
According to your guy St8izGr8 Byrd is reportedly at 6’7" – 6’8" and has put on 25 pounds of muscle, the latter at the encouragement of the MSU coaching staff, who see him as having a role as an inside/outside player, sort of a Raymar Morgan who can shoot the three. That would obviously bring him closer to Kaminski in both size and role.
Giant Byrd
I’ve heard at least one personal testimonial from this Spring that Byrd isn’t any taller than Day Day when they stand next to each other. Others claim he’s a giant. Only the tape measure knows for sure. I always play it cautiously pessimistic with reported heights. I’d love to believe Appling is a solid 6’2" but is he 6’ even? Possibly.
No doubt about Byrd’s muscle, though. The before/after pictures don’t lie.
St8 knows his ball but we’ve had our differences. Probably shouldn’t call him “my guy.” ;)

by 



















