The Season in Review: Scoring Points Edition
It's been over two weeks now since we last talked basketball. That's partly a function of the spring game, partly a function of The Great Jersey Fiasco of 2010 (as it will be referred to by historians centuries from now), and partly a function of catching our breath after what was arguably the most nerve-wracking Final Four run in the history of the modern NCAA Tournament.
I've been trying to figure out how to recap this season efficiently. Given the continuous string of ups and downs, I think detailed analysis may be a waste of time. To a large degree, this season defied analysis. The season results--a share of the Big Ten title and a second consecutive Final Four appearance--were both predictable and acceptable, but the paths the team took to get to those results were anything but predictable.
So partly for that reason, and partly because I have some other things I'd like to do this offseason, I'm going to forego the player-by-player season reviews I've done the last two offseasons. Instead, I'm going to do just two recap posts--one for offense and one for defense.
We'll start with offense. A comparison of MSU's 2009 and 2010 team-level tempo-free indicators follows the jump. These numbers cover the entire season, not just conference games.
| 2009 | 2010 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adj Tempo | 67.3 | 66.1 | (1.2) |
| Adj Efficiency | 115.0 | 112.9 | (2.1) |
| Raw Tempo | 66.8 | 66.1 | (0.7) |
| Raw Efficiency | 107.8 | 108.7 | 0.9 |
| Effective FG% | 49.8 | 51.6 | 1.8 |
| Turnover % | 20.7 | 21.3 | 0.6 |
| Off Reb % | 40.7 | 39.7 | (1.0) |
| FTA/FGA | 41.0 | 36.9 | (4.1) |
| 3P% | 35.4 | 34.4 | (1.0) |
| 2P% | 48.5 | 51.6 | 3.1 |
| FT% | 69.9 | 68.5 | (1.4) |
| Block% | 8.4 | 6.2 | (2.2) |
| Steal% | 9.0 | 9.9 | 0.9 |
| 3PA/FGA | 26.6 | 26.3 | (0.3) |
| A/FGM | 63.5 | 62.2 | (1.3) |
MSU's unadjusted offensive efficiency increased slightly from 2009 to 2010, but that was a function of playing a less taxing set of opponents. MSU played the 23rd toughest defensive schedule in 2010 (per KenPom) vs. the 3rd toughest schedule in 2009. The difference is at least partially the result of the significantly more difficult road to the Final Four the 2009 team took relative to the 2010 team.
On an adjusted basis, the Spartan offense went from 20th best in the country in 2009 to 28th best in 2010. That's not a dramatic fall, but it's disappointing in that MSU was replacing Travis Walton, who played the 2nd most minutes on the team in 2009 and was clearly a defensive specialist, with increased minutes for players with considerably more offensive potential.
In terms of the four factors components, the MSU players regressed slightly in both categories that determine how many shots a team gets off, turning the ball over at a slightly higher rate and grabbing offensive rebounds at a slightly lower rate. Neither change was dramatic, though. The lower offensive rebounding percentage (#6 national ranking in 2009) was somewhat inevitable with the departure of Goran Suton. MSU still ranked 10th in the nation in offensive rebounding percentage.
The team's effective field goal percentage mark increased noticeably, but it was entirely a function of shooting inside the arc. Kalin Lucas increases his 2-point shooting percentage nearly 10 points (.396 to .491); Draymond Green's increased playing time (.550 2pt%) was also a major factor.
The only player to increase his 3-point shooting percentage from 2009 to 2010 (while taking at least one shot per game) was Chris Allen (.311 to .398). Korie Lucious' .317 performance from beyond the arc, while taking a team-high 139 three-point shots, was a drag on the team's offensive efficiency.
Every returning MSU player saw his free throw rate drop from 2009 to 2010, perhaps reflecting the fact the team generally had more jump shooters on the floor than in 2009 (because of Walton's presence in 2009), reducing the need to attack the basket (or the perceived need to do so, at least).
Individual offensive numbers (with PORPAG!) are below. The first four columns of numbers are 2009 data; the next four columns are 2010 data; the final column is the change in PORPAG (Points Over Replacement Per Adjusted Game) from 2009 to 2010.
| OffRtg | Poss% | Min% | PORPAG | OffRtg | Poss% | Min% | PORPAG | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kalin Lucas | 110.4 | 25.4 | 79.8 | 2.81 | 110.1 | 25.4 | 69.2 | 2.41 | (0.41) |
| Goran Suton | 116.1 | 19.6 | 56.3 | 1.92 | (1.92) | ||||
| Raymar Morgan | 105.9 | 23.6 | 51.8 | 1.36 | 108.6 | 22.1 | 65.9 | 1.86 | 0.50 |
| Durrell Summers | 104.3 | 20.3 | 53.4 | 1.10 | 105.0 | 21.5 | 65.4 | 1.48 | 0.39 |
| Chris Allen | 101.4 | 23.7 | 47.6 | 0.94 | 109.1 | 16.9 | 61.8 | 1.37 | 0.43 |
| Delvon Roe | 103.2 | 18.7 | 44.9 | 0.79 | 108.7 | 17.8 | 51.4 | 1.17 | 0.38 |
| Draymond Green | 111.2 | 16.6 | 27.8 | 0.66 | 113.6 | 22.0 | 63.6 | 2.22 | 1.56 |
| Travis Walton | 97.7 | 13.6 | 69.4 | 0.57 | (0.57) | ||||
| Marquise Gray | 98.9 | 19.4 | 23.8 | 0.31 | (0.31) | ||||
| Korie Lucious | 92.4 | 22.7 | 22.6 | 0.14 | 93.5 | 17.8 | 55.6 | 0.34 | 0.20 |
| Idong Ibok | 63.4 | 8.7 | 10.9 | (0.14) | 0.14 | ||||
| Austin Thornton | 83.7 | 14.7 | 13.1 | (0.05) | (0.05) | ||||
| Garrick Sherman | 97.8 | 14.5 | 17.4 | 0.15 | 0.15 | ||||
| Derrick Nix | 93.7 | 19.7 | 18.8 | 0.13 | 0.13 | ||||
| TOTAL | 10.46 | 11.08 | 0.63 |
Kalin Lucas' big-picture offensive numbers were nearly identical from 2009 to 2010, as he again used possessions efficiently (offensive rating=110.1) while bearing the heaviest offensive burden on the team (usage rate=25.4). The decline in his PORPAG number was the result of missed playing time. A decline in assist rate from 29.6 to 25.8 was perhaps a function of Lucas playing off the ball more while Lucious handled the point guard responsibilities.
The loss of Goran Suton was offset by increased production from Draymond Green and Delvon Roe. Green saw a dramatic increase in both his playing time and his role in the offense, but actually managed to increase his efficiency from what was a pretty impressive level of offensive efficiency as a freshman. Among MSU's top 7 players, Green ranked 2nd in 2-point percentage, 3rd in assist percentage, 1st (lowest) in turnover percentage, and 2nd in offensive rebounding percentage. He did it all.
Delvon Roe saw his rebounding numbers decline somewhat (13.3 to 10.3 on offense) as he matched up more against opponents' biggest players. The increase in his free throw percentage (.455 to .661) helped him increase his overall offensive efficiency, though.
Unfortunately, freshmen Garrick Sherman and Derrick Nix weren't able to replace the production the team got out of Green and Roe as freshmen in 2009, as neither player ever played well enough for Tom Izzo to entrust him with double-digit minutes on a regular basis. I'm surprised how poor Sherman's ball-handing numbers were (2.2 assist rate, 28.8 TO rate), as I had recalled him making some good passes at times. Nix's free throw shooting (.271) was, of course, his Achilles' heel (he did finish the season having made 7 of his last 11 shots from the line, though).
Raymar Morgan, Durrell Summers, and Chris Allen all provided more offensive production in 2010 than they did in 2009, but the increases were marginal. In the cases of Morgan and Summers, increased PORPAG was a function of (1) more playing time (with Morgan having missed substantial playing time in 2009 due to illness) and (2) late-season surges in efficiency and assertiveness. In Allen's case, he did something you don't see from a lot of juniors--increasing his offensive efficiency while turning himself from a frequent shot-taker into an offensive role player, with his usage rate dropping nearly 7 percentage points.
Korie Lucious also scaled back the frequency with which he asserted himself on offense, but saw a much smaller corresponding increase in efficiency. He reduced his extremely generous 2009 turnover percentage of 32.0 just a tad to 27.7. After a solid start in the NCAA Tournament (8-4 assist-TO ratio in 3 games plus one all-time great 3-point make), Lucious eventually struggled as Lucas' replacement at the starting point guard position (combined 8-10 assist-TO ratio vs. Tennessee and Butler).
Overall, the team treaded water on offense in 2010, failing to reach the elite top-ten scoring potential they appeared to possess going into the season. Outside of Draymond Green, there were no breakout performances. Or, at least, there no season-long breakout performances. Morgan broke out at the close of the Big Ten season, and Summers broke out in the NCAA Tournament.
Given the lack of consistent offensive production from players not named Draymond (with Lucas' inconsistent production not being any fault of his own), the team needed some breaks to grab repeat Big Ten and Final Four banners--with the Morgan and Summers surges being critical factors in taking advantage of the breaks to achieve the respective repeat honors. Those breaks probably won't be there next season, meaning that enhanced and sustained offensive production is going to be needed from at least one or two players in the Allen/Summers/Lucious/Roe group.
Of course, none of the numbers I've presented above do justice to what this team accomplished in the final five weeks of the season. I told you this season defied analysis.
Next week: The defense.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yikes
Great analysis. How did this team ever win the (much stronger) Big Ten and get to the final 4? The issue all year was always going to be how to replace Suton on offense and Walton on defense. This time last year, we were hoping Herzog would be adequate and that either Nix or Sherman would give the team starter minutes, to replace Sutton. Neither happened. Maintaining the rebounding from the previous year was pretty amazing, but in the end they really missed Suton’s passing and savvy. On defense, Allen had his moments, but the team had no other particularly good on ball defender.
KJ’s numbers also suggest a degree of caution about next year. The team will miss Morgan. I can imagine another final four run — but it requires Lucas to come back 100%, for Sherman and Nix to both significantly improve, or Payne to come right in and be able to contribute at the 5, and for all the other returning players to have both improved, not only physically but also mentally. Otherwise, it is easy to imagine a disappointing season (akin to what might have been this last year, if Lucas misses a couple last second shots during the Big Ten season, and Lucious’ shot does not go in against Maryland).
All in all
it was a great season. Our efficiency numbers never quite got where our pre-season ranking suggested they should be, but ultimately we had a lot of success in both the regular season and tournament. I think we were all expecting a dropoff in defensive efficiency and hoping that improvements on offense would carry us through. Basically, that didn’t happen, as our offensive improvements were marginal, with the exception of Green and (arguably) Allen. Unfortunately, as you noted, Allen’s increased efficiency was offset by his smaller role in the offense.
I still think Roe could take a big leap forward if he can ever go a full season (and the majority of an offseason) without his knees being an issue. I think Green is close to his peak, but that peak is pretty darn good. He might be able to add a legit perimeter shot, which would make him even more lethal, but we are getting alot from him already. Lucas is pretty much as good as he’s going to get as well.
I see room for improvement next year if Allen can increase his role in the offense while maintaining his three point shooting and efficiency levels from this year, and Summers can play closer to the way he did in the tournament on a regular basis. I’m not expecting him to be quite that good regularly, but he clearly has the potential to play a lot better than he did for long stretches during the regular season.
The other X factor is Sherman and Nix. I’m not ready to write them off as perpetual role players yet. Both showed flashes of nifty post moves this year. With an offseason of practice to impove their defensive technique and (hopefully) ball handling, I’m hoping they can become solid contributors, and give us more size than we generally had on the court this year. If they can platoon effectively at center that allows Roe to go back to his natural power forward position. Green can obviously man the 3 spot more than adequately.
One final wild card is the turnovers. It seems inevitable at this point that our turnover rate will hover around 20 percent no matter what personnel we put on the floor. I’m convinced that a lot of it is a function of our offensive system, and that is not going to change, but if we can get it down under 20, or at least under 21 for the season, that would be nice. We were not a particularly good free throw shooting team this year either, so hopefully that will improve.
All in all we appear to have the talent and experience to contend for a third straight Big Ten title and another deep tournament run. Morgan will certainly be missed, but everyone else is back and with reasonable improvements from our younger players, and a full recovery from Lucas, we should be pretty good this coming year.
re: Green
Agree that an outside shot could be a nice addition to Green’s arsenal. At the same time, I’d really like to see him stay close to the post next season. Though it was an obvious necessity, moving Green out to become a ballhandler hurt us in games like Butler. We didn’t have the same offensive rebounding presence from him and couldn’t get those effort/garbage points. I’m hoping Lucas, Appling, and Lucious make Green moving away from the basket less and less necessary.
It depends on how Sherman and Nix develop
If they can pick up the slack on the boards then we wouldn’t miss Green’s presence there quite so much. I don’t want him floating on the perimeter all the time, but we need someone above 6’4" who can hit perimeter shots. Morgan was that guy this past year and I think Green has the potential to be the guy next year. I want him basically to be able to play the game Morgan played this year – let the matchup dictate when he’s floating out on the perimeter vs when he posts up.
by TheCrestedHelm on May 4, 2010 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions
improvements
I’m surprised you think that Green is “close to his peak”. I think his shooting range will increase and he will become a more than serviceable three-point shooter. The question is whether or not he can improve his body, and thus increase his athleticism. At times this year he did seem winded, and just looking at him, it’s hard to believe he can’t lose 10-15 pounds. What about his ability to read the game, and make good decisions?
Always room for improvement
but any further improvements will be relatively small compared to the leap he took as a sophomore. In terms of decision-making, he led the team in assist-TO ratio this season, so there’s only so much more room to improve there.
Agree that being able to stay on the floor another 3-4 minutes/game and knock down the occasional 3-pointer would be good things, but improvements by players other than Green (and Lucas) will be the key to success next season.
Fight for The Only Colors: Green and White!
by KJ@theonlycolors on May 4, 2010 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions
I could maybe see Green improving
to be on par with where Suton was as a senior – basically his offensive rating would increase by about 3 points. He’s already so good asking for more from him is a little greedy. I think there are others on the team that played much further below their potential than Green did. I’m hoping they’ll be the ones who step up their games consistently.
by TheCrestedHelm on May 4, 2010 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions
The charity stripe
Fouls and foul shots are not actually an obsession of mine – I just find myself continually going back to them this season. On both ends of the court they played a significant role in the differences between this season and last. In the College Basketball Prospectus for this year, John Gasaway pointed out that the success of the 2009 Spartans was due in large part to their ability to overcome mediocre shooting with offensive rebounds and free throws. Well, this year ORebs were down a bit and shooting up a bit but free throw rate was WAY down. We went from a national ranking of 50 in FTR to 188, from 4.6 above the D-I average to .8 below. Kalin Lucas, Raymar Morgan, Durrell Summers, Draymond Green, Chris Allen, Korie Lucious and Delvon Roe all got to the line at a lower rate than in 2009. If you’re looking for an explantion for the difference between season and tournament performance, the obvious choice, of course, is luck: MSU won a string of nail-biters and finally dropped one to Butler. BUT, they still had to stay in all those games, and it didn’t hurt that in the tournament their FTR was 42.2 (way better than the full season number for this year and even better than last year) and FT% went from 68.5 for the season to 70.5 in the tournament. And I would be remiss if I didn’t point out that the game with the fewest attempts and makes and worst percentage (3rd lowest rate) was the loss to Butler. Of course I’m not attempting to present the magic bullet explanation for the season, just a significant factor in offensive performance.
At some point,
I think we concluded the reduced FTR in the regular season was partially the result of lower foul rates generally among Big Ten teams.
Should have pointed that out in the post.
Fight for The Only Colors: Green and White!
by KJ@theonlycolors on May 4, 2010 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions
Maybe
It is definitely the case that FTR in the Big Ten was the lowest among the major conferences this year. But for that to explain the precipitous drop in MSU’s FTR then nearly all conference teams should have dropped. But Purdue, Illinois, Northwestern, Michigan and Indiana all got to the line more frequently than in 2009. It would also have to be the case that the Big Ten, alone among major conferences, experienced a conference-wide drop in fouls called. Maybe this happened, I haven’t run those numbers, but it seems less likely than MSU just falling off in that aspect of their game. I know that several years ago the (then) Big Ten Wonk noted that Steve Alford’s Iowa teams were heavily dependent on getting to the line as component of their offense, which is not a reliable source of points from year to year. I think we may have experienced, to a lesser degree, something similar with MSU this year.

by 



















