Roller Coaster - MSU 80, Indiana 65
In a game that featured big scoring runs by both teams, Michigan State prevailed for a tough home win in their Big Ten conference opener, handing Indiana its first loss of the season. The Spartans landed the first blow, pushing a 19-14 lead to 34-16 with just over 5 minutes left in the first half. The Hoosiers responded immediately with 3 straight threes to start a 38-11 surge that spanned halftime and resulted in a 54-45 Indiana lead. But back came the Spartans, who delivered the knockout punch with a 20-0 run that Indiana was unable to counter down the stretch. It was easily the most breathtaking, intense game of the MSU season and reminded you of just how great in-conference basketball can be.
The initial MSU surge was fueled by hot shooting from the starters and near-flawless half-court defense that forced Indiana into tough shots seemingly every trip. After Keith Appling's three-pointer created the 34-16 lead the Spartans missed their next 7 shots, which seemed affect their defense as well. An Appling layup shortly before the half broke the string and made it a 7-point MSU lead at the break.
Indiana roared out of the locker room for the second half, scoring the first 12 points. At this point they were on a 25-2 run and MSU seemed to have no answers for Christian Watford and Victor Oladipo, athletic players who seemed to be scoring at will. But the lockdown defensive intensity returned for MSU and the ensuing 20-0 run was enough to put Indiana away for good.
There was a bit of amused tweeting during the game about just how wild the Ken Pomeroy win-probability graph for this game would look. That graph will likely not be up until later, but here's the Statsheet.com game flow diagram that gives you a bit of the same flavor:
More graphs and player notes after the jump.
According to Statsheet.com this was a 66-possession game, so MSU managed to hold Indiana to (barely) under one point per possession. While that's not an especially stellar number, it is the lowest efficiency for Indiana so far this year and I'm going to give the offense and defense co-credit for this performance. Aside from the mid-game meltdown, especially the start of the second half, this was a complete performance at both ends for the Spartans.
The four factors graph looks like this:
With an eFG% of 59.4, the Spartans shot the ball very, very well. They shot 60% from two (24-40), 38.5% from three (5-13) and 77.3% (17-22) from the line in just missing another eFG% performance > 60. Meanwhile Indiana only managed 46.9%, a respectable number but, again, their second-lowest output of the season.
Indiana helped to keep themselves in this game on the glass. Although MSU "won" the rebounding battle 33-31, Indiana was actually better at both ends, posting a 34.2% OR% and a 69.2% DR%, topping MSU in both categories. There were just more defensive boards available for MSU to grab thanks to their shooting. Indiana was slightly above their season average on the offensive glass and they managed to get 16 second-chance points to the Spartans' 12. They had to send a lot of guys to the glass to get those numbers though, which left them vulnerable in transition, and they largely gave back those extra points by surrendering 17 fast-break points and scoring only 12.
Also notable: an excellent job taking care of the ball by MSU, with only 9 turnovers on the game. They also made their foul shots while sending Indiana, one of the national leaders in free-throw rate coming in, to the line only nine times (14.1 FTR). The official box score is here and the Statsheet.com game page is here.
Player Notes
Keith Appling – Just a tremendous game from Appling, who had a career high of 25 points to go with 7 assists and 6 boards. He was one rebound short of leading the team in all three categories and also had an emphatic block of Victor Oladipo in the second half. He did this while running the offense, continually forcing the pace and driving into the lane, and playing tireless on-ball defense, primarily on Jordan Hulls, who was held to 4 points, including 0-4 from three. He also hit 9 of his 10 free-throws. An excellent, complete game from Appling, clearly the MVP of the night.
Derrick Nix/Adreian Payne – Indiana freshman star Cody Zeller was almost a complete non-factor this game and Nix and Payne can take much of the credit. He had only 4 points, none in the first half and pulled down only 3 boards. There was a lot of talk after the game about MSU being "physical" with Zeller and "muscling" him in the paint. That was certainly a factor but mainly Indiana just couldn't get him the ball and when they did, he was not getting it deep with a chance to do any damage. On the offensive end Nix/Payne provided the only option that was working when the shooting went south in the second half. They clearly exposed Indiana's weaknesses on the interior and were a crucial part of MSU staying in this game. Nix finished with 14 points and 5 boards while Payne chipped in 8 and 2 in 15 minutes of action. And who can forget Nix leading the fast break after a nifty steal?
Also of note, Draymond Green was his familiar stat-sheet-stuffing self with 11 points, 7 rebounds, 4 assists, 2 blocks and 2 steals to go with just one turnover. He wasn't able to shut down Christian Watford, but I don't think anyone was going to do that. Watford went for 26, including 4-6 from three. With Appling playing so well Green didn't feel the need to take over and played a steady game within the flow of the offense. Brandon Wood had a quiet but solid 13 points and Branden Dawson was impressive early with a couple of athletic moves at the rim. He faded later on, finishing with 7 points. I was happy to see that of his 4 rebounds, 3 were defensive, which is an area where he should be able to do some more damage.
I was surprised to see that MSU's bench outscored IU's 16-12. During the game it seemed like everything was coming from the starters and, basically, that was true. 14 of those 16 points were from Nix, who actually played 8 more minutes than Payne, the nominal starter. Austin Thornton hit the only other shot from the bench, which is a bit of a concern. Only 9 players appeared in the game and Alex Gauna only went 5 minutes. No appearances by Russell Byrd or Brandan Kearney. Something to keep an eye on.
Overall, however, an excellent start to the conference season, as the Spartans handed the Hoosiers their first loss, ending a 12-game winning streak and extending one of their own. In fact, this is the first streak of 12 since the start of the 2000-01 season. That team was pretty good, as I recall. Next up: on the road to Nebraska, followed by a trip to the dreaded Kohl Center.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
NYE game at Nebraska...
I was hoping to go, since that is the closest B1G arena to me, but unfortunately the GF insisted on me staying in town for NYE.
https://twitter.com/#!/SpartanKC
Great Game. Period.
Lots to love. I was trying to think of how many inside/ouside, athletic big men MSU will face in conference similar to what Watford was able to do last night? Any thoughts of who else is comparable?
Our perimeter defense has been good, post defense has been good, but for those players that are big and can play on the perimeter or take it down, how many more players are we going to see like that?
Pic 9
Tonight's going to be a good night.
by Spartalytical on Dec 29, 2011 10:17 AM CST up reply actions
Awesome game
The energy early was great to see. Indiana landed a punch to end the first half, and landed another pretty good one to start the second. I was worried about how this team was apparently not responding, but wow several Spartans showed some real grit. I love how Appling tirelessly attacks the hoop and generates plays. Payne and Nix are doing better and better, defensively. If only Nix could have scored the layup after he stole the ball and ran (ran, I saw it!) the ball up the floor in traffic, the lid would have blown off Breslin. To see an energetic club like Indiana come in and for us to match and outdo it was impressive and fun.
Hopefully we’re not caught looking ahead to Madison just yet, this weekend.
Tonight's going to be a good night.
Great game
Awesome 2 way game from Appling!
Last year it seemed like his defense took away his offense but he found the perfect balance in that game. That was All-B1G caliber last night.
Derrick Nix! – I’m so impressed by him. He’s a completely different player and is now one of the most reliable. He actually led a break! Competently! This is what hard work can do.
Indiana is good. Very good. Watford is damned good.
The dreaded offensive drought returned. Rebounding is a concern but I love the way the team fought back and re-forced their(its) will on IU.
"The $hi+'s chess it ain't checkers!"
BTW, I hate ESPN
Prior to the game I heard Mike Tirico doing one of those annoying monologues on ESPN Radio. At the end he brought up the IU MSU game and said something to the effect of a resurgent IU team will take on a Spartan team that “still has trouble scoring but is a tough out nonetheless.”
Has trouble scoring? 74, 89, 90 in the 3 previous games.
If you want to dismiss the team because they don’t impress you, that’s fine.
At least say something remotely factual though. Idiot.
"The $hi+'s chess it ain't checkers!"
At least say something remotely factual though.
That would require at least a minimal amount of effort and research, though, something which “tWWL” apparenlty isn’t willing to do. You would think that, with the size of the research & intern staffs they must have, that Tirico would be getting fed accurate or relevant info. Might as well have talked about how the Spartans are stuggling because of inexperience & that this is a rebuilding season.
I unfortunately listen to them on the radio a lot too (I live in Chicago so it’s not like local sports radio is any better, and you can only listen to so much CNBC), Doug Gottleibg actually knows his stuff when it comes to NCAA hoops – he’s been calling MSU a “for real team” for weeks now.
Late Last Night
I heard an ESPN anchor comment on the highlights of the game that “Michigan State came back from 18 down in the first half to win by 15”.
In fairness, I suspect that most of the ESPN anchors and analysts are reading on the fly off of quickly compiled notes and did not actually see or study the games they’re commenting on.
You see the same thing in other sports both in college and professionally. Most people simply don’t notice because they don’t know enough about one or both teams involved in any given game.
Haha I caught that too. I was like wait did they just say we were trailing by 18??
And of course they had to repeat those highlights over and over. I thought sportscenter was supposed to be live 24/7 now.
Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand - Kurt Vonnegut
They do three different live editions I think
Maybe four. The nighttime one plays until the next day and the others replay once maybe… I dont really know but that what it seems like.
Yes he absolutely is
He’s been in beast mode all month, and I think as this team further develops and gels, he will continue to grow as a point.
and here we were second-guessing Izzo on that, myself included!
And even Thornton seems to be proving his value as of late. I still think his ceiling is fairly low despite his work ethic but in Izzo I trust.
Oh and my UK fan friends didn’t appreciate me rattling their cages about us beating IU by 15 and them losing by 1. Hee hee.
by Drew Perkins on Dec 29, 2011 6:32 PM CST via Android app up reply actions
The rotation:
I expect to continue to see shortened rotations now that we are in the B1G season. I’m not surprised at all at no BK or Byrd, and limited Gauna. I’m totally fine with a shortened bench in conference play.
I’m also fine with Thornton getting his 15 minutes or so when he plays like he has been (mostly) as of late – limited touches on offense, only taking shots inside where he can draw fouls, and aggressively going after long rebounds (he’s been saving or creating at least 2 extra possessions last few games on those long 50/50 misses). His D still sucks, but I can live with it when he makes it up at the line & on those boards, and minimizing the turnovers.
The Nix/Payne deal at center is working as well as anyone could possibly have hoped, and I just hope they can keep this going until Gauna is capable of contributing something besides just a warm body. My fear is that an injury or slump to one of those two will really expose the hole that Roe’s retirement has left. If Gauna can step up a little, or really just play like he did in the previous two games, he will completely have mitigated the loss of the Shermanator.
Appling and Wood are looking fantastic right now as a starting backcourt, and a great thing about them is that Appling can slide to the 2 when Trice comes in, and be just as effective off the ball as he is on. Wood’s D & rebounding have stepped up exponentially since Izzo called him out earlier in the season, and he has a much better handle than recent off guards like Summers or maybe even Ager. Trice was almost non-existent last night, but he’s in a great spot to learn on a team that’s winning a lot & while young, has key veterans at every spot on the floor.
Dawson has been emerging the last several games, though still seems to “disappear” from time to time. Howeva, he continues to show more game, and I think it’s all going to come together for him soon.
And finally there is Day-Day. I just love watching him on the court, I’m not sure if there is another player in America right now that’s as well rounded as he – and even if there is, I wouldn’t trade away Green bc of his intelligence, leadership, and passion. He just wants to win so bad, and I really think his leadership is a huge reason why the Spartans are doing so well this season. The guy’s freaking name is Green – he was born to be a Spartan & do great things here. My expectation is that he’ll single-handedly win at least one more game this season when he goes into Beast Mode a la the Gonzaga game. He really will take this team places this year.
One thing I noticed
As well as Nix played, I think he could have scored even more points. We were just shooting so well, they didn’t rely on him much. He has done a tremendous job learning how to get himself in a good position to receive the ball down low. Last year it seemed like he would just kind of wander around down there, now he’s fighting for position. There were plenty of times I noticed him begging for the ball, but the guards didn’t feed it to him.
Another thing that was nice about this game was the officiating. I usually get driven nuts by basketball officials. Seems like they are always blowing the whistle in anticipation of a foul instead of waiting until a foul actually occurs. They seemed to let the teams play a little more in this game and the flow of the game was much better because of it.
The tripping continuation call
is the only one really generating any fuss on the IU boards.
Tonight's going to be a good night.
by Spartalytical on Dec 29, 2011 2:33 PM CST up reply actions
Considering it was a clear-path situation
they’re a little lucky for it not to have been called a whatever-the-heck-they-renamed-from-intentional foul. (“Intentional” was seriously misleading, but at least it was easy to distinguish from “flagrant”; I have no idea whether a flagrant-1 is more or less severe than a flagrant-2 without looking it up.)
I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side.
Bradley-Terry rankings for college football and basketball: because there aren't enough computer rankings already.

by 





















