Nine-Game Big Ten Schedule Starts in 2017, and What It Means to Michigan State
The Big Ten announced today that starting in 2017, nine conference games will be played. The bulletpoints, some of which will be obvious:
- Since the number of regular season games a team can play (barring going to Hawaii) is still 12, this means one less non-conference game per year.
- Playing nine conference games per year means some Big Ten teams will play five conference home games and others will play four. Michigan State (along with Iowa, Nebraska, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio State) will have five conference home games in 2017 and odd-numbered years thereafter, while Northwestern, Minnesota, Michigan, Penn State, Wisconsin, and Purdue will have theirs in 2018 and every even-numbered year.
- Nothing will change regarding the cross-division protected match-ups. The Old Brass Spitoon will be contested every year, you can safely retreat from the ledge.
What you will very likely see is teams playing all their nonconference games at home during the years they have four conference home games to ensure they have seven games' worth of revenue. Michigan State, like other teams, will have to do some opponent juggling from 2017 on if they want to ensure seven games in East Lansing every year. Let's start when the nine-game conference schedule commences.
2017: Alabama, at Notre Dame, South Florida, Western Michigan
MSU only needs two home games this year to get to seven, so the game at Notre Dame is safe, as is Alabama. Western Michigan will most likely stick as the MACrifical lamb, so the South Florida game is going to get pushed somewhere else. It'll be tricky as to where the Spartans play though -- they have one away nonconference game every year until possibly 2019 at the earliest.
2018: Central Michigan, at Eastern Michigan, Notre Dame
MSU will play four conference home games in 2018. The issue here will be how much it'll take to buy EMU out of this game, or at the very least have it in Spartan Stadium to reach the magic number seven. The other solution is to move it to 2020, when the only conference game scheduled is against Miami (Hurricanes, not Hawks). The Notre Dame will have to be at home this season.
2019: Western Michigan, Notre Dame
The Spartans will likely travel to South Bend for this one. WMU won't have to move, and a MAC or 1-AA squad will probably fill the third spot.
2020: Miami (FL)
All's fine and dandy. Schedule two teams that need a payday here and this season's nonconference games are all set.
2021: @ Miami (FL)
See above.
2022: @ Boise State, Notre Dame 2023: Boise State, Notre Dame
2024, 2025: Notre Dame
Switch around the home and away order for Boise State and everything should work. EDIT: Scratch that previous sentence. It looks impossible for Michigan State to honor both its contracts with Boise and ND and still have seven home games per year. One of the Boise State games will have to move somewhere else or be cancelled entirely.
Also, 2023 could be a possible date where MSU travels to Tampa to take on South Florida. EDIT: Or not. Every other year before then has the Spartans traveling for a nonconference game or has them needing to play all games in East Lansing to get to seven home contests.
This isn't the dearth of good nonconference opponents some fear (that could still happen though, as contracts). It will be harder to get to a bowl game and get to the national title game, but isn't that what a majority of the fan base wants in a way? I've heard many times here that Michigan State needs to improve its nonconference scheduling, and it happened...sort of. Yes, it will be harder to get to a good bowl game/national title game (especially in 2017 -- Alabama AND Notre Dame?). However, as fans we'll have less weeks where nine or ten Big teams play 1-AA squads, and as a spectator I'd count that as a victory.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Gotta disagree with you
You’re working off the assumption that ND is not going to be happening every year. Jabba got them out of the rivalry for two years – but only two years. Both schools have implied it will continue – and there’s no reason it shouldn’t. With a H & H with ND, and 4/5 & 5/4, that’s 5 away games every year. That means no H & Hs OOC.
For the 2 years we don’t travel to ND, we can put 1 H & H. We currently have BSU, Bama, Miami, and WVU as H & Hs. One of those will stick – my guess is Boise since it was a 2 for 1. This is also going to screw up the 3 for 1 deal we struck with the directional schools.
This is terrible for MSU (and for the BT), and my only hope is this gets changed by the BT in the next few years, or, the NCAA moves to 13 games, with a requirement of 7-6 for bowls.
We're in the same boat with ND
I’d rather drop them and let them wither.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
ND’s path to irrelevance just got a whole lot easier.
by njd on Aug 4, 2011 7:35 PM CDT up reply actions
You're right
MSU will play ND in 2022-2023, but not during 2020-2021. I’ll edit the post to reflect that information.
SEC fan who is very curious what Big 10 fans (and Pac 12) fans think about the 9 CGS
Playing 8 conference games in the SEC (Big 10, Pac 12, ACC) is tough enough to start with and for the teams that win their respective divisions, there is the ninth game added on that can be a positive or negative (undefeated Bama a couple of years ago lost a close one to UF after going undefeated for example). SEC teams (teams in bigger conferences) pick up a 1-AA (a lot of the time at least one per year) and catch some flack for it, but it is a win-win for both: great home pay day for the bigger school and good pay day for the smaller school—not to mention the smaller school gets their NCAA tourney day with a chance to knock off Michigan, Virginia, Va. Tech David. McNeese St. walked into Tiger Stadium and played us tough and a lot of their fans made the trip also.
I think the flexibility in scheduling for OOC games is the big advantage, you might have those 1-AA’s but you have more of an opportunity to pick up the games with Bama and even have two decent OOC games: it is tough, but I like that LSU picked up Oregon this year and have WVU also; last year we had UNC and WVU.
"Fast Eddie: No bar?
Cashier: No bar, no pinball machines, no bowling alleys, just pool... nothing else. This is Ames, mister."
From the movie--The Hustler
GET TO THE RIM HEAT (and SKY)! ATTACK THE PAINT!
I'm conflicted, but lean towards it's a good thing
In theory schools could play more than one tough non-conference opponent, but that’s rarely the case. Look at Penn State’s non-con schedules for example in the coming years. Yick. It’ll take some finessing to make sure schools get the money they need, but if you can give the fans one more good game per year, I’m all for it.
Some complain that it’ll be harder for a Big Ten team to make it to the national title game, but to tell the truth I really couldn’t care less about that.
Pretty much....
….agree.
We’re probably trading a 1-AA team for a Big 10 team and MSU’s schedules won’t get too embarrassing because we play ND every year and have a bunch of BCS conference opponents lined up.
If you lose your ninth conference game, you probably didn’t deserve to play for a national championship*.
You're wrong
Were trading a home and home with Boise State, Bama or MIami for a H & H with 1 of: Purdue, Wisky, OSU, PSU, or Illy.
MSU will always have 7 home games on the schedule – to not do so is just leaving money on the table. The ONLY good thing about this move is that it means we likely won’t be playing @ EMU.
big ten volley ball
A 9 game conference schedule pushes Purdue down yet another notch. http://bit.ly/nkYjBZ
Maybe a Win!
Won’t everyone in the opposite division from the really bad teams be trying to get them as their additional conference game?
LEGENDS: Iowa, Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota, Nebraska, Northwestern
LEADERS: Illinois, Indiana, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, Wisconsin
So everyone in Legends wants Indiana and Purdue, maybe Illinois and everyone in Leaders wants Minnesota and maybe Northwestern. They have to be able to get something out of that.
Although, yes, in theory, if these bad teams can’t schedule non-conference automatic wins their records will look even worse. Never mind.

by 




















