Half Full of Glass: MSU 64, Michigan 54
Ask any fan of college basketball what to expect from a Tom Izzo team, and the first thing you'll hear is along the lines of "an almost fanatical devotion to rebounding". Rarely has that been better illustrated than Sunday's game.
Four factors:
Michigan posted a respectable eFG% and won the turnover battle decisively. Free throws made up some of the gap, but the key was clearly the battle on the glass. The numbers are incredible: 12 of 25 possible offensive rebounds, 28 of 31 (!) defensive rebounds. Draymond Green, as you might have heard, had a big influence on this: he had 16 rebounds total (the same number as Michigan's entire team), 14 on defense. His knee didn't appear to be bothering him at all in his 38 minutes, and Michigan had absolutely no answer on the glass. (Just how ridiculous was his rebounding? He got to nearly half - 47.5% - of available defensive rebounds while on the floor. I don't think that's a record, but it's got to be up there.)
Derrick Nix added six more boards, Branden Dawson and Brandon Wood four each, Austin Thornton and Adreian Payne three each. Evan Smotrycz was the only Michigan player to manage even four rebounds.
On the season, MSU now ranks 14th in offensive rebounding at 39.6%, 13th in defensive rebounding at 73.6%. That's just shy of the 2009 team's finishing ranks of 6th and 11th.
The other key to this game: defending Trey Burke and keeping him from getting drives which would either lead to a lay-up or a kick out to an open shooter. While there were a few easy lay-ups, for the vast majority of the game Michigan had to resort to bombing away with long, contested jumpers. Combine that with allowing no second chances and getting back nearly half of your own misses, and only an astronomical disadvantage in turnovers could have derailed the game.
Game flow chart:
MSU jumped out in front early and never really looked back; the last time Michigan was closer than 8 points was at 15-9. While the game never got completely put away until a late run to get to our biggest lead of the game (57-40), it was never really in serious doubt either.
With eight games left, the schedule breaks out into three groups:
- The bottom-feeders: Visits from Penn State and Nebraska. Either of these games being competitive with five minutes left would worry me more than any of our losses to date.
- The must-get road games: Minnesota and Purdue are no pushovers, and at home they'll certainly be motivated for a potentially bid-clinching upset, but if this team wants to hang a regular-season banner, these are games that we really need. You can usually afford a couple of road losses to mid-level teams, but we've already got those. Assuming we take care of business here:
- The deciding games: Home games against Wisconsin and OSU, road trips to Indiana and OSU. Get through these four at 3-1 and there's a good chance of at least a share of the Big Ten title. Drop two, and chances are slim at best (especially if it's a sweep by OSU). Ken Pomeroy has us underdogs in three of these (all but home against Wisconsin), but Indiana on the road and OSU at home are nearly toss-ups.
Next up: Penn State, Wednesday night, 6:30 PM.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great review,
awesome picture of Mateen & Draymond, too!
And it’s even better when seeing our rebounding dominance in chart form! Frankly, if it wasn’t for M finally connecting on a few bomb threes (plus that atrocious and-one call in Jordan Morgan’s favor that preceded the Izzo tech), this could easily have been a 20 + point blowout. I listened to this live in the car, then wacthed it on DVR after the Super Bowl, and our guys were clearly better at every position on the floor. Hopefully they can keep this momentum going to finish the season and postseason strong.
Also, the Izzone was rocking, looked great on TV. They need to keep that up, too.
This was a vintage MSU win in every sense
Play good help defense to prevent dribble penetration and force contested long-range jumpers? Check. Dominate on the boards? Check. Turn it over a little too often? Check. Score effectively on possessions when you don’t turn it over? Check. Pretty much the stereotypical Izzo-era win.
Honestly, watching this game reminded me of why I love our defense as opposed to some others.
Some other schools may pride themselves on “defense lives here”, but quite frankly watching MSU play good defense is a thing of beauty.
There is such a better flow to our games from defense to offense and back. We’re not a defense based on kids trying to scramble to get into position to take a charge. We play man to man help defense and it looks like basketball. Not European soccer.
GREAT post
This is defense at its finest, fundamentally sound, still very aggressive and physical.
by Flaming Mo on Feb 7, 2012 4:33 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
They didn't even bother trying to rebound
Not sure it would’ve mattered though.
Draymond Green is a rebound machine.
He went double H-A-M with a side of Who Gon Stop Me.
I’ve now seen him toss everyone from Wood to Nix aside to get a rebound.
They should just rename the war drill after him.
Interesting subplot next year will be who steps up and grabs the rebounds Green used to get. I’ll vote for Dawson.
Amazing how much UM relies on a freshman to win games for them. Lil #3 definitely carries the mail for them and as he goes they go. I think this is much to the chagrin of #10. The kid is talented for sure but it’s a lot to ask of a sub 6’0 freshman to carry you through the grind of a B1G season.
That would never happen on a Coach Izzo team where freshmen are role players if they play at all. That should probably be reconsidered as prospects are getting more and more talented and “ready” at earlier ages(just look at all the NBA superstars under the age of 24).
After watching Green do his work and listening to Coach Izzo spend about 100 minutes gushing over him at the presser, no need to fix what ain’t broke.
"Long range from the baseline, Swish!"
Maybe Nix
If Gauna can play significant minutes next year (or Costello – is he coming in next year?) at the 5 they could slide Nix over to power forward and have Payne and Costello/Gauna at the 5. With that kind of size on the floor opposing front courts will be begging for mercy.
by TheCrestedHelm on Feb 7, 2012 12:51 PM CST up reply actions
Doubtful
Nix isn’t much of a rebounder outside of his area.
However, the #1 subplot next year will be what will another summer of hard work do for Nix. He made quite a leap this year.
Costello is in next year but probably won’t get the minutes to have a huge impact on rebounding.
"Long range from the baseline, Swish!"
I think what we'll see more is
tandem pairings. Nix and Payne may play together in crunch time next year, but I think most the time it’ll be one of them and one of the young bigs pretty much all the time. But you’re right our front court is turning into a very deep well oiled machine slowly before our eyes.
Depth and Length
What if the Shermanator was still here? Suffice it to say that I can see why he transferred.
Izzo has been on quite a roll recruiting really. Next year we will have
5 Forwards (Avg. Height: 6’ 9.2"),
5 wings (Avg. Height: 6’ 5.6"!) and
2 PG’s (Avg. Height; 6’)
If we take Kaminski out of that equation, we have a solid 11 man rotation with a ton of backcourt versatility when you consider that Kearney and Valentine can play the 1, Appling can play the 2 and Harris can play the 2 or 3, Dawson and Byrd can play the 3 or 4. When the other team goes small, we can play Trice-Appling-Harris-Dawson-Nix, and when they go big we can play Appling-Harris-Dawson-Payne-Nix. Come up against a PG like Greivis Vasquez? Throw Kearney in at the point and all of the sudden we don’t have a guy under 6’5" out there.
I think you have to take Kaminski and Valentine out of that equation
I don’t get the immediate hype on Valentine, I think from everything I’ve seen he has the LEAST chance of making an impact as a freshman. Will he be a great player? I think at the least he’ll be a solid spartan, but I think he needs to develop, especially considering the similarity in his game to Kearney. Kearney has a year of in game experience on Valentine, as well as another year of weight training. I am already predicting that Kearney will start at the two over Harris next year. Let’s remember how Izzo treats freshman and rewards the deserving.
But your basic point is sound. The size and depth of this team is what excites me because Izzo can do with every position what he’s doing with Nix and Payne. Throw out multiple players per position that would start on most teams in the conference and have them continually rested, thus forcing the other team to play their one good player against our two. At least that seems to be the goal.
I'm not sure I get what you're saying re: the way "Izzo treats freshmen"
Izzo has no trouble starting freshmen if they fill a position of need. Didn’t Raymar start as a freshman. I know Roe did. I am sure others did as well, but without the time to go back and look I can’t list them here. Dawson is another example. If Roe was playing this year no way would Dawson be starting, but as Green needed to move to the 4, Dawson filled a position of need. I think we can say confidently that Appling will be our starting point, Dawson at wing, and probably Payne and Nix. So there is another wing position in need with the departure of Wood and Thornton. If Harris can perform at least as well as Kearney, Izzo will have no problem starting him. I don’t disagree with you that Kearney could start, just your implicit suggestion that Harris won’t start because Izzo doesn’t start freshmen. If he’s good enough to start, he’ll start for Izzo.
by Chitown Spartan on Feb 8, 2012 11:58 AM CST up reply actions
Freshmen do start
If there’s no alternative.
I think his point was that Coach Izzo prefers to start experienced guys and he will have experienced guys at Harris’ position.
Zach Randolph may have been his best freshman and he didn’t start.
There was no better alternative to starting Raymar and he ended up having a decent season.
That being said, I think Harris is good enough to start right away.
Both he and BK could start actually.
The PayneNix tag team has been so effective he may not want to start them both. Plus Dawson is being prepped for the Raymar role and he’s less effective on the perimeter. Plus BK can guard multiple positions and can assume Green’s facilitator role so a Keith-Harris-BK-Dawson-Payne starting 5 is possible.
Man! I’m excited about this team’s present and future.
"Long range from the baseline, Swish!"
Dawson at the 4
He is not all that much smaller than Green, and obviously more athletic. If he puts on a little more weight, he could definitely be an effective 4.
I feel like there are just so many options with this team looking ahead. How does an opposing coach gameplan for all these different looks Izzo can throw at them?
Good point
I’ve always had that in my head that Izzo doesn’t like freshmen starting, but now that you mention it, he hasn’t been very shy about it recently.
That being said, I think to begin the season we’ll see Kearney starting. That’s not to say he’ll be starting the whole season, but I think he’ll be the more composed player and will be a good deal better acclimated to the college game than Harris. Also, having a cerebral player like Kearney out there to start the season will let us get into an offensive rhythm earlier as a team.
PS
Who’s the kid on the right side of the photo?
Is that a potential recruit? Kid of an alum?
If not, how’d he get such a good seat?
I hear Drake Harris was at the game but I don’t know what he looks like.
"Long range from the baseline, Swish!"
And how come the guy on the left edge looks like Ron Zook?
Is the Zooker a fan?
As long as we're talking about the photo
How short is that girl on left? Is she even 5’0", or is she sitting down?

by 



















