clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

TOC Talk: The 2010 Michigan State Football Outlook

New, comments

So we've got all the hard data we're going to get for the next four months. Here's what we know (or, rather, what I think I know):

  • The team is talented, deep, and experienced at the offensive skill positions. The best pure passer in the league will be throwing to a talented stable of receivers and handing off to as many as four running backs with playmaking ability.
  • The offensive line is unsettled. The pass blocking more than likely won't be as good as it was last season. The run blocking, almost as a matter of simple mathematics, has to be better.
  • The defensive line has potential, but it's potential of the very young variety.
  • The linebackers are led by the top defensive playmaker in the league and show enough depth for the 3-4 to be a real possibility as the base defense--which could just maybe mean less predictable defensive play calling.
  • The starting defensive backs (Rucker/Adams/Hyde/Robinson) look good on paper, although that's the only place the defensive backs looked good last season.
  • The punter is a senior. The placekickers are freshmen (effectively).
  • The schedule has pluses (all four nonconference games are [basically] at home, no Ohio State) and minuses (Michigan, Iowa, and Penn State on the road).

Corrections? Predictions? Prognostications? Vacillations?

We'll take any of those.