FanPost

Michigan State's Free Throw Struggles: A Deep Dive

Mike Carter-USA TODAY Sports

[Editor's note: Awesome deep-dive. If you're not following @basketballfan66 you should be!]

Michigan State came into the season ranked #18 in somewhat of a rebuilding year, but they’ve struggled in a variety of ways so far this season, including half-court offense (Maryland), defense (@Nebraska), inability to finish at the rim (Kansas), and finding a go-to player down the stretch. However, the most recurring and glaring issue has been its free-throw shooting. As it stands MSU is currently shooting 63.1% from the line. Since the ’01-’02 season, the national FT% has only varied between 68.7% and 69.9% per KenPom. As of February 1, the national average is 68.9%. MSU is ranked 327 of 351 teams and is 3rd worst of any Power 5 conference school. Since the 2001-2002 basketball there have been a total of 160 different B1G teams. While MSU boasts 4 of the top 7 free throw shooting teams from this period, the 2014-2015 team is currently No. 155 of 160.

Best B1G Free-Throw Shooting Teams
Per Game Total
RK Year Team FTM FTA FTM FTA FT%
1 2011 Wisconsin 12.4 15 384 466 82.4%
2 2015 Illinois 14.6 18.4 321 405 79.3%
3 2005 Michigan St 15.8 20.4 442 570 77.5%
4 2006 Michigan St 15.8 20.5 521 676 77.1%
5 2004 Michigan St 15.1 19.6 437 568 76.9%
6 2012 Nebraska 11.2 14.6 335 437 76.7%
7 2002 Michigan St 14.2 18.5 425 556 76.4%
Worst B1G Free-Throw Shooting Teams
Per Game Total
RK Year Team FTM FTA FTM FTA FT%
160 2002 Northwestern 11.3 18.7 328 542 60.5%
159 2008 Illinois 11.8 19.4 413 679 60.8%
158 2005 Northwestern 9.5 15.5 294 482 61.0%
157 2008 Penn State 11.2 17.9 346 556 62.2%
156 2007 Illinois 12.2 19.6 416 665 62.6%
155 2015 Michigan St 11.5 18.2 253 401 63.1%

Changes from Last Year

To see how players have progressed since last year, the chart below contains the summaries of the non-freshmen's free-throw shooting of the last two years.

Season-to-Season Free Throw Percentage Comparison
2014 2015
Player FTM FTA FT% FTM FTA FT% Change in %
Denzel Valentine 44 65 67.7% 40 48 83.3% +15.6%
Matt Costello 33 50 66.0% 37 51 72.5 +6.5%
Alvin Ellis 13 22 59.1% 9 15 60.0% +0.9%
Bryn Forbes 103 126 81.7% 26 32 81.3% -0.5%
Gavin Schilling 11 21 52.4% 27 54 50.0% -2.4%
Travis Trice 36 44 81.8% 49 71 69.0% -12.8%
Branden Dawson 42 64 65.6% 24 53 45.3% -20.3%

(Reminder: MSU only returned 6 scholarship players from last year's roster)

Valentine spent a lot of time in the gym last summer working on both his FT's and his jump shot and it has clearly paid off. Costello made a modest jump, while both Ellis, Forbes, and Schilling's shooting is very close to where it was last year. Dawson and Trice, on the other hand have significant percentage drop-offs that have no obvious explanation. While Dawson did have his wrist injury he only shot 43.5% (10-23) leading up to that point. He made only 1 of his next 9 attempts immediately after returning from the injury but had a decent stretch going 9-13 in games against PSU and Rutgers. With the injury issues out of the way, we have to hope that he listens to Professor Garland and he ends up shooting >60% for the rest of the season . With Trice, larger minutes may be a factor as he is playing about 11 more minutes per game and it may be having a negative impact on his shooting.

First Half vs. Second Half

Because free throw shooting does not happen in a vacuum there are factors to look so we can see why players make or miss them. One thing I was curious about was whether a team shoots better in the first or second half. These are small sample sizes but from what I found the main 3 guards (Valentine, Trice, Forbes) are mostly unaffected while the main 3 bigs (Dawson, Schilling, Costello) shoot better in the first half than in the second. The other players either have very minor differences or do not have a large enough sample size to really compare.

Comparing First Half & Second Half Free-Throw Percentages
Total First Half Second Half Overtime
Player FTM FTA FT% FTM FTA FT% FTM FTA FT% FTM FTA FT% % Change Between Halves
Travis Trice 49 71 69.0% 18 27 66.7% 27 40 67.5% 4 4 100% +0.8%
Gavin Schilling 27 54 50.0% 12 21 57.1% 13 28 46.4% 2 5 40.0% -10.7%
Branden Dawson 23 51 45.1% 14 26 53.8% 9 25 36.0% 1 2 50.0% -17.8%
Matt Costello 37 51 72.5% 18 22 81.8 13 23 56.5% 6 6 100% -25.3%
Denzel Valentine 40 48 83.3% 9 11 81.8% 26 30 86.7% 5 7 71.4% +4.8%
Bryn Forbes 26 32 81.3% 12 14 85.7% 12 14 85.7% 2 4 50.0% 0.0%
Marvin Clark Jr. 19 26 73.1% 8 12 66.7% 11 14 78.6 0 0 N/A +11.9%
Lourawls Nairn Jr. 11 22 50.0% 3 6 50.0% 8 16 50.0% 0 0 N/A 0.0%
Javon Bess 9 21 42.9 1 3 33.3% 8 18 44.4% 0 0 N/A +11.1%
Alvin Ellis 9 15 60.0% 0 1 0.0% 9 13 69.2% 0 1 0.0% +69.2%
Colby Wollenman 0 4 0.0% 0 4 0.0% 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A N/A
Trevor Bohnhoff 2 4 50.0% 0 0 N/A 2 4 50.0% 0 0 N/A N/A
Totals 253 401 63.1% 95 147 64.6% 138 225 61.3% 20 29 69.0% +3.3%

Historical Precedent

With fatigue from the season as potential factor, I decided to look at FT shooting percentages from the most recent MSU teams. What I found was actually encouraging looking ahead to the rest of the season. Every year the Spartans' FT% increased after their 21st game.

First 21 games vs. The Rest of the Season
First 21 games Remaining Games
Year FTM FTA FT% FTM FTA FT% Change in FT%
2015 239 379 63.1 % ?? ?? ?? ??
2014 309 446 69.3% 206 282 73.0% +3.8%
2013 294 412 71.4% 210 293 71.7% +0.3%
2012 321 463 69.3% 210 296 70.9% +1.6%
2011 297 437 68.0% 187 254 73.6% +5.7%
2010 303 442 68.6% 220 315 69.8% +1.3%
2009 333 492 67.7% 279 385 72.5% +4.8%
2008 319 439 72.7% 177 235 75.3% +2.7%

It seems as though there is a more concerted effort towards making FT's down the stretch because the stakes usually become higher. Looking at some of the trendlines, there typically appeared to be a decline in FT% in the middle of the season.

While there are many factors that affect free-throw shooting, the numbers I found left me a little more optimistic moving forward to the end of the season

(Bonus: I looked for a correlation between FT% and number of possessions per game to see if in-game fatigue might be a factor but there was no significant correlation. If anything it was the opposite of what I hypothesized in that FT% was typically higher in larger possession games. My educated guess is that more possessions → more guards in transition → more guards taking FT's rather than bigs.)

This is a FanPost, written by a member of the TOC community. It does not represent the official positions of The Only Colors, Inc.--largely because we have no official positions.