[Editor's note: Awesome deep-dive. If you're not following @basketballfan66 you should be!]
Michigan State came into the season ranked #18 in somewhat of a rebuilding year, but they’ve struggled in a variety of ways so far this season, including half-court offense (Maryland), defense (@Nebraska), inability to finish at the rim (Kansas), and finding a go-to player down the stretch. However, the most recurring and glaring issue has been its free-throw shooting. As it stands MSU is currently shooting 63.1% from the line. Since the ’01-’02 season, the national FT% has only varied between 68.7% and 69.9% per KenPom. As of February 1, the national average is 68.9%. MSU is ranked 327 of 351 teams and is 3rd worst of any Power 5 conference school. Since the 2001-2002 basketball there have been a total of 160 different B1G teams. While MSU boasts 4 of the top 7 free throw shooting teams from this period, the 2014-2015 team is currently No. 155 of 160.
Best B1G Free-Throw Shooting Teams | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Per Game | Total | ||||||
RK | Year | Team | FTM | FTA | FTM | FTA | FT% |
1 | 2011 | Wisconsin | 12.4 | 15 | 384 | 466 | 82.4% |
2 | 2015 | Illinois | 14.6 | 18.4 | 321 | 405 | 79.3% |
3 | 2005 | Michigan St | 15.8 | 20.4 | 442 | 570 | 77.5% |
4 | 2006 | Michigan St | 15.8 | 20.5 | 521 | 676 | 77.1% |
5 | 2004 | Michigan St | 15.1 | 19.6 | 437 | 568 | 76.9% |
6 | 2012 | Nebraska | 11.2 | 14.6 | 335 | 437 | 76.7% |
7 | 2002 | Michigan St | 14.2 | 18.5 | 425 | 556 | 76.4% |
Worst B1G Free-Throw Shooting Teams | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Per Game | Total | ||||||
RK | Year | Team | FTM | FTA | FTM | FTA | FT% |
160 | 2002 | Northwestern | 11.3 | 18.7 | 328 | 542 | 60.5% |
159 | 2008 | Illinois | 11.8 | 19.4 | 413 | 679 | 60.8% |
158 | 2005 | Northwestern | 9.5 | 15.5 | 294 | 482 | 61.0% |
157 | 2008 | Penn State | 11.2 | 17.9 | 346 | 556 | 62.2% |
156 | 2007 | Illinois | 12.2 | 19.6 | 416 | 665 | 62.6% |
155 | 2015 | Michigan St | 11.5 | 18.2 | 253 | 401 | 63.1% |
Changes from Last Year
To see how players have progressed since last year, the chart below contains the summaries of the non-freshmen's free-throw shooting of the last two years.
Season-to-Season Free Throw Percentage Comparison | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 2015 | ||||||
Player | FTM | FTA | FT% | FTM | FTA | FT% | Change in % |
Denzel Valentine | 44 | 65 | 67.7% | 40 | 48 | 83.3% | +15.6% |
Matt Costello | 33 | 50 | 66.0% | 37 | 51 | 72.5 | +6.5% |
Alvin Ellis | 13 | 22 | 59.1% | 9 | 15 | 60.0% | +0.9% |
Bryn Forbes | 103 | 126 | 81.7% | 26 | 32 | 81.3% | -0.5% |
Gavin Schilling | 11 | 21 | 52.4% | 27 | 54 | 50.0% | -2.4% |
Travis Trice | 36 | 44 | 81.8% | 49 | 71 | 69.0% | -12.8% |
Branden Dawson | 42 | 64 | 65.6% | 24 | 53 | 45.3% | -20.3% |
(Reminder: MSU only returned 6 scholarship players from last year's roster)
Valentine spent a lot of time in the gym last summer working on both his FT's and his jump shot and it has clearly paid off. Costello made a modest jump, while both Ellis, Forbes, and Schilling's shooting is very close to where it was last year. Dawson and Trice, on the other hand have significant percentage drop-offs that have no obvious explanation. While Dawson did have his wrist injury he only shot 43.5% (10-23) leading up to that point. He made only 1 of his next 9 attempts immediately after returning from the injury but had a decent stretch going 9-13 in games against PSU and Rutgers. With the injury issues out of the way, we have to hope that he listens to Professor Garland and he ends up shooting >60% for the rest of the season . With Trice, larger minutes may be a factor as he is playing about 11 more minutes per game and it may be having a negative impact on his shooting.
First Half vs. Second Half
Because free throw shooting does not happen in a vacuum there are factors to look so we can see why players make or miss them. One thing I was curious about was whether a team shoots better in the first or second half. These are small sample sizes but from what I found the main 3 guards (Valentine, Trice, Forbes) are mostly unaffected while the main 3 bigs (Dawson, Schilling, Costello) shoot better in the first half than in the second. The other players either have very minor differences or do not have a large enough sample size to really compare.
Comparing First Half & Second Half Free-Throw Percentages | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | First Half | Second Half | Overtime | ||||||||||
Player | FTM | FTA | FT% | FTM | FTA | FT% | FTM | FTA | FT% | FTM | FTA | FT% | % Change Between Halves |
Travis Trice | 49 | 71 | 69.0% | 18 | 27 | 66.7% | 27 | 40 | 67.5% | 4 | 4 | 100% | +0.8% |
Gavin Schilling | 27 | 54 | 50.0% | 12 | 21 | 57.1% | 13 | 28 | 46.4% | 2 | 5 | 40.0% | -10.7% |
Branden Dawson | 23 | 51 | 45.1% | 14 | 26 | 53.8% | 9 | 25 | 36.0% | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | -17.8% |
Matt Costello | 37 | 51 | 72.5% | 18 | 22 | 81.8 | 13 | 23 | 56.5% | 6 | 6 | 100% | -25.3% |
Denzel Valentine | 40 | 48 | 83.3% | 9 | 11 | 81.8% | 26 | 30 | 86.7% | 5 | 7 | 71.4% | +4.8% |
Bryn Forbes | 26 | 32 | 81.3% | 12 | 14 | 85.7% | 12 | 14 | 85.7% | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0.0% |
Marvin Clark Jr. | 19 | 26 | 73.1% | 8 | 12 | 66.7% | 11 | 14 | 78.6 | 0 | 0 | N/A | +11.9% |
Lourawls Nairn Jr. | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | N/A | 0.0% |
Javon Bess | 9 | 21 | 42.9 | 1 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | N/A | +11.1% |
Alvin Ellis | 9 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 9 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | +69.2% |
Colby Wollenman | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | N/A | 0 | 0 | N/A | N/A |
Trevor Bohnhoff | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | N/A | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | N/A | N/A |
Totals | 253 | 401 | 63.1% | 95 | 147 | 64.6% | 138 | 225 | 61.3% | 20 | 29 | 69.0% | +3.3% |
Historical Precedent
With fatigue from the season as potential factor, I decided to look at FT shooting percentages from the most recent MSU teams. What I found was actually encouraging looking ahead to the rest of the season. Every year the Spartans' FT% increased after their 21st game.
First 21 games vs. The Rest of the Season | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First 21 games | Remaining Games | ||||||
Year | FTM | FTA | FT% | FTM | FTA | FT% | Change in FT% |
2015 | 239 | 379 | 63.1 % | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? |
2014 | 309 | 446 | 69.3% | 206 | 282 | 73.0% | +3.8% |
2013 | 294 | 412 | 71.4% | 210 | 293 | 71.7% | +0.3% |
2012 | 321 | 463 | 69.3% | 210 | 296 | 70.9% | +1.6% |
2011 | 297 | 437 | 68.0% | 187 | 254 | 73.6% | +5.7% |
2010 | 303 | 442 | 68.6% | 220 | 315 | 69.8% | +1.3% |
2009 | 333 | 492 | 67.7% | 279 | 385 | 72.5% | +4.8% |
2008 | 319 | 439 | 72.7% | 177 | 235 | 75.3% | +2.7% |
It seems as though there is a more concerted effort towards making FT's down the stretch because the stakes usually become higher. Looking at some of the trendlines, there typically appeared to be a decline in FT% in the middle of the season.
While there are many factors that affect free-throw shooting, the numbers I found left me a little more optimistic moving forward to the end of the season
(Bonus: I looked for a correlation between FT% and number of possessions per game to see if in-game fatigue might be a factor but there was no significant correlation. If anything it was the opposite of what I hypothesized in that FT% was typically higher in larger possession games. My educated guess is that more possessions → more guards in transition → more guards taking FT's rather than bigs.)